<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Agronomy Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2639-3166</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAR-18-2084</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2639-3166.jar-18-2084</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>NIRS Footprint of Bio-Fertilizers from Hay Litter-Bags </article-title>
        <alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">smart nirs network for bio-fertilizers</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Giorgio</surname>
            <given-names>Masoero</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841669444">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841668796">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841573628">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Marco</surname>
            <given-names>Delmastro</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841670308">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Alberto</surname>
            <given-names>Cugnetto</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841669444">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Giusto</surname>
            <given-names>Giovannetti</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841671532">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Marco</surname>
            <given-names>Nuti</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841570676">5</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1841669444">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Accademia di Agricoltura di Torino (TO)</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1841668796">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line>Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestale e Alimentari, Università di Torino (TO)</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1841670308">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line>IMAMOTER, CNR, Albugnano (AT)</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1841671532">
        <label>4</label>
        <addr-line>Centro Colture Sperimentali, CCS-Aosta s.r.l. (AO)</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1841570676">
        <label>5</label>
        <addr-line>Università di Pisa (PI)</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1841573628">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>Corresponding author</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Paramanandham</surname>
            <given-names>Joothi Pillai</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841424180">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1841424180">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology and Wildlife Biology, AVC College (Autonomous), Mannampandal - 609 305. Tamil Nadu. India.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>Giorgio Masoero Accademia di Agricoltura di Torino, Via A. Doria 10, 10123 Torino, Italy <email>giorgioxmasoero@gmail.com</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1842144564">
          <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2018-05-30">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>22</fpage>
      <lpage>33</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Giorgio Masoero, et al.</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org//jar/article/772">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org//jar/article/772</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The biofertilization of cropsusing  microbial biota in the soil (MBS) is a modern practice that is used to sustain fertility. MBS agents can promote the yield and health of crops,  by luxuriating in the shoot as well as in the root systems. Farmers devoted to systematic MBS  fertilization are creating a “<italic>Symbiotic</italic>” (S) form of agriculture, which offers a greater advantage  of resilience than Conventional (C) or organic farming. Since MBS  is  involved in organic matter degradation, hay-litter-bag probes can be used to reflect a global functionality of the active soil, in the  short-medium term.  It is here shown that the NIRS hay-litter-bag technique, intended not as mass decay but as a quality evolution of the hay probes, can be modelled as a valid footprint of  S <italic>vs.</italic> C  soils.  A patented MBS was used in eight experiments in which litter-bags from an S treated thesis  were compared with equivalent litter-bags from a non-inoculated C thesis.  The chemical signature of the S <italic>vs.</italic> C in the litter-bag composition   was a percentage decrease of  sugars and fibres. A smart NIRS device was used to  discriminate the origin of the S <italic>vs.</italic> C litter-bags and a sensitivity of 71% (P&lt;0.0001) was obtained.    External validations on 37 S farms showed that three NIRS models  discriminated the true positive S spectra, with a sensitivity of 90% as single and  98% as compound probabilities The NIRS radiation of the hay-litter-bags confirmed the results of the S <italic>vs.</italic> C agriculture soil footprint. Moreover, the SCIO-NIR devices also made it possible to connect the S farms in a smart network.     </p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>NIRS</kwd>
        <kwd>biofertilizer footprint</kwd>
        <kwd>hay-litter-bag quality</kwd>
        <kwd>smart NIR-SCIO</kwd>
        <kwd>rapid analyses.</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="2"/>
        <table-count count="4"/>
        <page-count count="12"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1841409700" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Biofertilizer arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi  (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are prominent protagonists in the sustainability search  for global agriculture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842186364">1</xref>, also concerning  the horizons of the BioAg Alliance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842184060">2</xref>and Engineering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842249580">3</xref>. Their potential can be spread to the  different agricultural systems described by Narain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842262324">4</xref>, thanks to the properties of resilience inductors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842280684">5</xref>.  A meta-analysis of ﬁeld studies on the responses of wheat to AMF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842039044">6</xref> has highlighted that ﬁeld AMF inoculation can be proposed as an effective agronomic practice for wheat production, with aboveground biomass increases of around 20%, as assessed under Indian <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842038396">7</xref>and in high  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842025884">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842026460">9</xref> or low <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842028836">10</xref>Italian input   conditions. AMF phenotypes are expressed in accord to  the Law of the Minimum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842021908">11</xref>.  Phosphorus acquisition efficiency is the key feature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842019172">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842017084">13</xref>, but Thirkell et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842008348">14</xref> managed to resolve the paradox of nitrogen: while N-mineral fertilization has been shown to elicit luxuriating and strong mutualism, similar responses have been found to be lacking following the addition of N-organic substances; the Authors,  have shown that allowing hyphae access to an organic material can  improve the total N and P content, with a simultaneous and substantial increase in the plant biomass (+66% for both the hypogeal and epigeal). The use of fertilizer microbial biotas of the soil (MBS), even at a minimal density of 14 AMF spores per maize seed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842025884">8</xref> , has multiple effects: acidification of the roots and stem <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842005180">15</xref>; greater resistance to disease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842003812">16</xref>;  fortifications of  the functional properties, such as the antioxidant potential <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842000356">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841997620">18</xref>.  Several beneficial effects have been observed  along the forage-milk-meat chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842011084">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841985972">20</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841985612">21</xref>. </p>
      <p>The  agricultural market crisis in Italy and Europe has led to a diversification of the supply of products, and also of the methods adopted to obtain  different sustainable productions. For some time, several  both conventional and organic farmers have engaged in a so called “<italic>Symbiotic</italic><italic>Agriculture</italic>” (S) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841982156">22</xref>, in which a systematic use of MBS biofertilizers is adopted. </p>
      <p>Considering the chemical  parameters of the multifaceted soil fertility that could be rapidly predicted by means of an NIRS examination  of the soil bulk sample <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841979924">23</xref>, lacking of objective rapid measurements able to  assess the microbial status of agrarian soils in the present work we aim to demonstrate that a biofertilizing change is real in biochemical functioning mechanisms, and that such a change can easily be testified.  </p>
      <p>The use of Litter-bags is a technique that has long been adopted in soil studies on microfauna evolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841991372">24</xref>, as well as on mass and / or CHN decay  driven by  fungi <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841988636">25</xref>. The idea of coupling a litter-bag to a smart-NIRS technique has sprung from the availability of a new instrument that has been tested successfully with iced milk <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841973460">26</xref> on live rabbits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841968492">27</xref> and for meat                 discrimination  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841985612">21</xref>. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841384940">
      <title>Experimental Procedure</title>
      <p>The method presented in this study excludes weighting operation and is based on a footprint of a summary microbial transformation of a standard hay litter-bag evaluated according the  percentage variation of the composition on a short-medium term.  The work of   Santoni <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841965540">28</xref> has indicated  how the more numerous recalcitrant compounds (hemicellulose, ash,  ether extract, crude protein and lignin) showed a parabolic upward trend that pointed out an attenuation of the accumulation percentage and a decrease after a maximum at around 60 d. In parallel, the labile substances (cellulose in the NDF and crude fibre) showed a less pronounced downward trend.</p>
      <sec id="idm1841384868">
        <title>Litter-Bag </title>
        <p>The easiest and most repeatable substrate for field-scale purposes was identified as being a hay for small animals (“<italic>Vita Verde Small Animal Alpine Hay</italic>”, by Vitakraft pet care GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Bremen, DE). The hay was ground in a 3 mm grid forage mill (Retsch GmbH, Haan, DE).  About 5 g of hay was  packed into half empty 10x10cm square polypropylene nets (1.5 mm mesh),  which were then resealed using 4 staples, and  a plastic label was added for identification and for easiness of finding  purposes. The probes were inserted vertically near the roots and remained underground for about 60 days. They were then dried at mild temperature, gently cleaned and preserved at room temperature.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841383788">
        <title>Litter-Bag Composition</title>
        <p>The chemical composition of the hay and           litter-bag  residues was predicted, using a  Perkin Elmer IdentiCheck <sup>TM</sup>   instrument (714-3333 nm), and the used equations were established on twelve species of crops, analysed at four stages, as reported by  Tassone et al (2014) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841965180">29</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841385516">
        <title>NIRS Discrimination of the Litter-Bag Origin</title>
        <p>The extracted litter-bags were opened, and the surfaces of both sides were examined using a  smart new miniaturized NIR web-based wireless               spectrophotometer (SCIO v. 1.2, Consumer Physics, Tel Aviv) with a 740-1070 nm range. Three spectra were acquired on the two sides of the litter-bags. Chemometrics of the 331-point spectra was performed  using a categorical discrimination procedure, integrated within the  SCIO Lab proprietary software  named AKA (Also Known As), and the confusion matrix, after normalization and 1<sup>th</sup> derivation of the spectra. The reclassification capacities in the Symbiotic (S)  and Conventional (C)  classes within each calibration experiment,  where S litterbags were compared with C litterbags,  or in validation experiments, with only S litterbags, were  considered as the reference of the performances.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841382564" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>Eight experiments were set up under different conditions for calibration purposes in order to observe the NIR spectra and decomposition of the litter-bags, as well as the S <italic>vs.</italic> C discrimination ability. The involved crops were : <italic>Lolium</italic>, Wheat, Coffea, Grapevine, Pear, Quercus and Olive (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1849229476">Table 1</xref>), and the litter-bag experiment concerned   106 C-type litter-bags, which were  compared with 143 S-type litter-bags in two complex of 249 FT-Perkin Elmer and of 698 NIRS-SCIO spectra. The common denominator of the trials was the fertilisation of the soil with a patented MB,  Micosat F ® (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.micosat.it" ext-link-type="uri">www.micosat.it</ext-link>), a consortium  based on: AMF from finely ground cultivated sorghum roots,  containing spores  and <italic>ifae</italic> of <italic>Funneliformis</italic><italic>coronatus</italic> GO01 and GU53, <italic>F.</italic><italic>caledonium</italic> GM24, <italic>F.</italic><italic>intraradices</italic> GB67 and GG32, <italic>F. </italic><italic>mosseae</italic> GP11 and GC11, <italic>F. </italic><italic>viscosum</italic> GC41; saprotrophic fungi: <italic>Streptomyces spp</italic>. ST60, <italic>Streptomyces spp</italic>. SB14, <italic>Streptomyces spp</italic>. SA51, <italic>Beauveria spp</italic>. BB48, <italic>Trichoderma </italic><italic>viride</italic>, <italic>T. </italic><italic>harzianum</italic><italic>, Trichoderma </italic><italic>harzianum</italic> TH01, <italic>Trichoderma </italic><italic>atroviride</italic> TA28,<italic> Trichoderma spp</italic>.; rhizosphere bacteria: <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> BA41, <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> PN53, <italic>Pseudomonas spp</italic>. PT65 and <italic>Pochonia</italic><italic>chlamidosporia</italic>,  in the relative percentage of 40% crude inoculum (AM fungi) and 21.6% bacteria and saprotrophic fungi. </p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1849229476">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Setup of the calibration (#1-8) and validation (#9-10) experiments.</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Experiment No.</td>
              <td>Colture</td>
              <td>Year</td>
              <td>Site</td>
              <td>No.                   Litter-bags</td>
              <td>Microbial Biota Soil<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="idm1841324004">1</xref>                        Treatments</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>Lolium</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>Meadows</td>
              <td>14</td>
              <td>10 kg ha<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, in  2016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>Wheat</td>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>Field</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>3 kg ha<sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842186364">1</xref>  tanning</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>Coffea</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>Pot, GH</td>
              <td>27</td>
              <td>5 g pot<sup>-1</sup> granular, in 2016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>Grapevine</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>Pot</td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>5 g pot<sup>-1</sup>in 2014</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>Grapevine</td>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>Pot</td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>5 g pot<sup>-1</sup>in 2016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>Pear</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>Orchard</td>
              <td>34</td>
              <td>10 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> in 2016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>Quercus - Truffle</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>Orchard</td>
              <td>54</td>
              <td>10 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, in 2015 and in 2016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>8</td>
              <td>Olive</td>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>Orchard</td>
              <td>71</td>
              <td>20 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, in  2016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>9-A</td>
              <td>Crops / Meadows</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>Fields</td>
              <td>43</td>
              <td>Symbiotic for five years</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>10-B</td>
              <td>Crops / Meadows</td>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>Fields</td>
              <td>46</td>
              <td>Symbiotic for six years</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841324004">
            <label>1</label>
            <p>Microbial Biota Soil, MBS: Micosat F ®</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>In order to validate the litter-bag-NIR-SCIO technique, 37  farms belonging  to the “<italic>La </italic><italic>Granda</italic><italic> quality food consortium</italic>” (Fossano, It), which started to use   a systematic biofertilization of their fields five-six years ago in order to develop  a Symbiotic production chain, introduced 89 litter-bags into S-type fields and meadows. The validation experiment lasted two years (A, B)  and 318 spectra were obtained.  The eight models that predicted the S <italic>vs</italic>. C type from the calibration experiments were applied to the validation data-set spectra. The classification percentage of the S-type   spectra correctly predicted as  S-type (sensitivity) was calculated for each model. In order to formalize an “<italic>NIRS</italic><italic>biofertilizer</italic><italic>footprint</italic>”, the best three models were then considered for single and for  compound probabilities of false negative, by applying a “symbiotic” score  predicted from the three independent models to  each spectrum:  a value of 1 was scored for the S grade and a value of 0 for the C grade. The total symbiotic score of a litter-bag thus  varied from 0 (Conventional, nine  C=0 from the three models applied to the three spectra) to 3 (fully Symbiotic,  when the three models all predicted S=1). The compound probability of the non-S outcome, that is, the false-negative cases, was then fitted from the 318 S spectra. </p>
      <p>The composition of the litter-bags was analysed by means of a mixed one-way model considering the soil type (S <italic>vs.</italic> C) fixed and the effect of the experiments random <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841961724">30</xref>. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841322204" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec id="idm1841322060">
        <title>NIRS Discrimination of the Litter-Bag Origin</title>
        <p>The calibration of the SCIO spectra from  experiments 1-8 is reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1849149348">Table 2</xref>.  The average AKA reclassifications were 71% for  S (P&lt;0.0001) and  62% for C (P&lt;0.0001) , with variation coefficients of about 25% between experiments.  The results were confirmed from the validation sets in experiments 9 and 10 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1849149348">Table 2</xref>), where  overall classification ratings of 78±4% for year A and 71±5% for year B were obtained. Among the eight  models, numbers 2, 3 and 5 were the best ranking ones for the A and also for the B years : in fact, their average classification ability was  89.9±3.1% and 90.1±3.6%, respectively.  Compounding   information from the best three chained models (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1848911004">Table 3</xref>) raised the probability of not obtaining one false negatives in a correct classification for true S  membership to 98.4±0.12%. </p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1849149348">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Calibration of NIR-SCIO spectra in eight experiments for the Conventional © and Symbiotic (S)                  footprint of litter-bags and validation on  37  Symbiotic farms of single and the best three chained models.  Values in classification percentages (C-&gt;C and S-&gt;S = Sensitivity).</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Exp</td>
                <td> Crop </td>
                <td>Year </td>
                <td colspan="5">Calibration  </td>
                <td colspan="6">Validations  </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td colspan="3">No.                 Spectra </td>
                <td colspan="2">Classification% </td>
                <td colspan="3">Set-A  </td>
                <td colspan="3">Set-B  </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td>C</td>
                <td>S</td>
                <td colspan="2">C-&gt;C</td>
                <td>S-&gt;S</td>
                <td>S-&gt;S</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>SEM </td>
                <td>S-&gt;S</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>SEM </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>Lolium</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>26</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td colspan="2">90%</td>
                <td>54%</td>
                <td>57%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>5.10%</td>
                <td>43%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>6.20%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>Wheat</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>53</td>
                <td colspan="2">45%</td>
                <td>91%</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>90%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.10%</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>94%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.00%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>Coffea</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>59</td>
                <td colspan="2">50%</td>
                <td>72%</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>91%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>2.90%</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>85%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>4.50%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>Grapevine-1</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>26</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td colspan="2">51%</td>
                <td>89%</td>
                <td>60%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>5.00%</td>
                <td>41%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>6.10%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>Grapevine-2</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td colspan="2">52%</td>
                <td>65%</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>88%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.30%</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>92%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.40%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>Pear</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>62</td>
                <td>64</td>
                <td colspan="2">73%</td>
                <td>51%</td>
                <td>84%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.70%</td>
                <td>81%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>4.90%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>Quercus- Truffle</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>59</td>
                <td>58</td>
                <td colspan="2">73%</td>
                <td>52%</td>
                <td>77%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>4.30%</td>
                <td>57%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>6.20%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>Olive</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>55</td>
                <td>111</td>
                <td colspan="2">60%</td>
                <td>93%</td>
                <td>79%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>4.20%</td>
                <td>72%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>5.60%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td> </td>
                <td>Total / Means</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td>294</td>
                <td>404</td>
                <td colspan="2">62%</td>
                <td>71%</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td> </td>
                <td>Prob. &gt;50%</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td colspan="2">&lt;0.0001</td>
                <td>&lt;0.0001</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>9-A</td>
                <td>Various</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td>129</td>
                <td colspan="2"> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td>78%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>4%</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>10-B</td>
                <td>Various</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td>189</td>
                <td colspan="2"> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td>71%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>5%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td> </td>
                <td>Total / Means</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>318</td>
                <td colspan="2"> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="8"> Means of the best three chained Models in bold (2, 3, 5)<italic> </italic> </td>
                <td>89.90%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.10%</td>
                <td>90.10%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>3.60%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <table-wrap id="idm1848911004">
          <label>Table 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Classification probability of the Symbiotic grade 3, 2 and the compound classification (3 or 2) &gt;1, or false negative cases, from the three best equations in the validation of the 318 Symbiotic spectra.</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Symbiotic Grade result /3</td>
                <td>Prob.</td>
                <td colspan="2">Compound Classification</td>
                <td>SEM</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td colspan="2"> (3 or 2) &gt;1     ±</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>71.70%</td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
                <td> </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>26.70%</td>
                <td>98.40%</td>
                <td>±</td>
                <td>0.12%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The overall average validation grade was  2.73±0.25 (data not shown in the table), a sure sign of effective modifications in the litter-bag composition after the BMS treatments.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841226124">
        <title>Litter-Bag Composition</title>
        <p>As far as the evolution trend of the litter-bags (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1848955428">Table 4</xref>), compared to the original hay, is concerned, the overall  result of the degradative processes increased the value of the multivariate crop maturity index  towards a more mature type of forage, by 81% in C and  64% in S. The percentage of recalcitrant components increased in the litter-bags: hemicellulose (88% C and 98% S), ether extract (55 and 60%), ash (45 and 47%), indigestible NDF (26 and 9%) and lignine (ADL 17 and 19%). On the other hand, the labile components underwent  an average relative decrease:   crude  fibre (-22 and -36%) and acid detergent fibre (ADF -19     and -22%).    As for the MBS inoculation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1848955428">Table 4</xref>), five  significant variables  distinguished the  S litter-bags from  the C ones: the nitrogen-free  (NFE -3%, P=0.007) and the wall components decreased (NDF  -10%, P=0.0006; indigestible NDF -13%, P=0.08 ; crude fibre -17%, P=0.0541), but  the crude protein increased (+13%, P=0.0025), and  was thus apparently more protected from the added BM. Moreover,  the  lipids increased (+6%, P= 0.0247). </p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1848955428">
          <label>Table 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Composition of the hay and of the litter-bags in the Conventional (C) and Symbiotic (S) fields.</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Dry matter composition</td>
                <td>Unit</td>
                <td>CConventional</td>
                <td>SSymbiotic</td>
                <td>S C<sup>-1</sup>%</td>
                <td>Prob.</td>
                <td>HayH</td>
                <td>C H<sup>-1</sup>%</td>
                <td>S H<sup>-1</sup>%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crop maturity                 index</td>
                <td>n</td>
                <td>1.09</td>
                <td>0.99</td>
                <td>-20%</td>
                <td>0.4306</td>
                <td>0.6</td>
                <td>81%</td>
                <td>64%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crude fibre</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>136</td>
                <td>112</td>
                <td>-17%</td>
                <td>0.0541</td>
                <td>174</td>
                <td>-22%</td>
                <td>-36%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Indigestible NDF</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>182</td>
                <td>158</td>
                <td>-13%</td>
                <td>0.0823</td>
                <td>145</td>
                <td>26%</td>
                <td>9%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Neutral detergent                  fibre – NDF</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>427</td>
                <td>385</td>
                <td>-10%</td>
                <td>0.0006</td>
                <td>426</td>
                <td>0%</td>
                <td>-10%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Acid detergent  fibre – ADF</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>267</td>
                <td>249</td>
                <td>-6%</td>
                <td>0.1828</td>
                <td>329</td>
                <td>-19%</td>
                <td>-24%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Predicted dry                          matter at harvest</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>153</td>
                <td>146</td>
                <td>-5%</td>
                <td>0.2932</td>
                <td>129</td>
                <td>18%</td>
                <td>13%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Nitrogen free                             extract – NFE</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>529</td>
                <td>518</td>
                <td>-3%</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>475</td>
                <td>11%</td>
                <td>9%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cellulose</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>223</td>
                <td>219</td>
                <td>-2%</td>
                <td>0.8151</td>
                <td>206</td>
                <td>8%</td>
                <td>7%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Digestible NDF</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>328</td>
                <td>325</td>
                <td>-1%</td>
                <td>0.721</td>
                <td>306</td>
                <td>7%</td>
                <td>6%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Gross energy</td>
                <td>MJ kg-1</td>
                <td>16.38</td>
                <td>16.4</td>
                <td>0%</td>
                <td>0.9721</td>
                <td>16.54</td>
                <td>-1%</td>
                <td>-1%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lignine – ADL</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>88</td>
                <td>89</td>
                <td>1%</td>
                <td>0.8454</td>
                <td>75</td>
                <td>17%</td>
                <td>19%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Ash</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>200</td>
                <td>202</td>
                <td>1%</td>
                <td>0.6953</td>
                <td>137</td>
                <td>45%</td>
                <td>47%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>In vitro total                                digestibility –IVTD</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>822</td>
                <td>841</td>
                <td>2%</td>
                <td>0.1686</td>
                <td>855</td>
                <td>-4%</td>
                <td>-2%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>NDF digestibility</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>634</td>
                <td>668</td>
                <td>5%</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>0.1649</italic>
                </td>
                <td>680</td>
                <td>-7%</td>
                <td>-2%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hemicellulose</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>148</td>
                <td>156</td>
                <td>5%</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>0.3041</italic>
                </td>
                <td>79</td>
                <td>88%</td>
                <td>98%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Ether extract</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>36</td>
                <td>39</td>
                <td>6%</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>0.0247</italic>
                </td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>55%</td>
                <td>65%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crude protein</td>
                <td>g kg<sup>-1</sup></td>
                <td>123</td>
                <td>141</td>
                <td>15%</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>0.0025</italic>
                </td>
                <td>127</td>
                <td>-3%</td>
                <td>11%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841083236" sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion </title>
      <sec id="idm1841082444">
        <title>Litter-Bag Composition</title>
        <p> According to  Tassone et al. (2014) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841965180">29</xref> concerning the algebraic formula of the crop maturity index for  growing plants,   the regression sign of the percentage on the days from sowing was  positive for NDF, ADF and indigestible NDF,  while it was negative for ash, crude protein, NDF digestibility and               digestible-NDF. After  haymaking,  in the underground environment the grasses composing the litter-bags started an ontogeny involution,  as a result of biotic and abiotic factors, but also because of  BMS action. The observed rise in protein may be a sign of increased MBS growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841988636">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841958988">31</xref> , and the net result was that the fibrolytic  communities elicited the attacks of the carbohydrates. In terms of crop maturity index, the BMS increased the evolution  of the litter-bags towards a more mature type of residue,  as can be observed  in  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1848669588">Figure 1</xref>, where  the lines of the S and C trends cross.  Our results suggest that, as expected, BMS  promotes the mechanisms that are favourable for  an early maturation of the residual organic matter in the root horizon, and multi-annual observations are necessary <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841946708">32</xref>. BMS management is  based on the inoculation of aerobic microbes, but,  because  of a luxuriating rhizosphere,  and in spite of respiration-fermentation processes, the net long term result could improve the carbon footprint of the whole plant-soil system, and thus raise its sustainability.  Several  soil management practices, inspired by a conservative agriculture design for the improvement of the accumulation of soil organic matter, are largely supported by EU agricultural policies, while  the pro-MBS route has  been totally neglected, in spite of the phosphate crisis that is expected from 2030 onwards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841943180">33</xref>.</p>
        <fig id="idm1848669588">
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Relative deviation of the litter-bag residues from the  hay composition after 60 d of landfilling for the Symbiotic and Conventional groups and litter maturity tendency  enhanced in the S vs C conditions.</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image1.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p>The results of the present work are in agreement with Leolini’s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841941236">34</xref> results (ibid Table 12) obtained from  a litter-bag quality study conducted on  six natural sites in Spain, in which  four litter types were considered.  In fact, as  a result  of  some mild differentiated activities, a significant linear increase was observed in the Spanish study  for the ash and  ether extract percentages,  but  the digestible NDF also  increased, while no labile constituent  was reduced. In the agrarian and well cultivated soils of the present work, the litter quality appeared to be modified to a great extent, and the MBS  attacked  the labile components,  which arithmetically enhanced the percentages of the counterparts. In the MOLTE                 long-term organic experiment  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841973460">26</xref>(ibid Fig. 72),  only a  mild  footprint  of the Organic vs<italic>.</italic> Conventional soil was found by means of a multivariate analysis of the predicted constituents (R<sup>2</sup>0.18±0.04) or, rather, in the direct NIR spectra   discrimination (R<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842184060">2</xref> 0.32±0.06).  </p>
        <p>Litter-bag  decomposability, intended as mass decay, can be related to NIR spectra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841939724">35</xref>, and these correlations were  also present in the data from Florence University: in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841941236">34</xref> R<sup>2</sup>0.46 for the residual mass; in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841965540">28</xref> 0.74 for the residual mass and 0.90 for the k decay term (recalculated). In  the present work,  the quantitative aspect of litter-bags was omitted, because of operational difficulties at a large scale,  but also after  results from the MOLTE experiment which elicited a more meaningful structural and functional  relationship from the variability of the litter-bag quality  than from considering the total  lost mass or the exponential decay.  MBS activities in litter-bag matrices mainly depend  on the unexplored vast communities in  the foreign soil, and to a lesser extent on  the  microbiome of the hay. The outcomes of litter-bag modifications  are also modulated by abiotic factors, such as the  pabulum conditions, i.e.  thermic, water and mainly the redox-oxygen availability. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841953692">36</xref>, an incubation of litter-bags for two months could allow the  net N mineralization to be estimated, and in the present BMS framework, an N preservation appeared. The effect of the MBS treatment on the symbiotic fingerprint appeared to be quite consistent and repeatable for the five  significantly varied constituents.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841078268">
        <title>NIRS Discrimination of the Litter-Bag Origin</title>
        <p>As far as the discrimination problem is concerned,  can these five signs be considered a valid support to obtain  an univocal response that could help to testify the use of MBS as biofertilizers? The chemical composition of litter-bags needs a chemometric deconvolution of  a broad NIR-IR spectra (714-3333 nm), which could be obtained from high-quality scientific  instruments. These devices represent a valid tool to help understand some mechanisms,  but are less portable for a large-scale dimension. Thus, thanks to the overtones and combinations of the organic molecules  in the electromagnetic spectrum,  originating in the IR region, a surprisingly small but rich NIR spectra 740-1070 nm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1848662748">Figure 2</xref>) can be capitalized on by means of vibrational spectroscopy.  For field   sampling   and analyses operations on a smart-farm basis, the S footprint should be  directly searched for in the electromagnetic spectrum. Considering the immensity  of the biotas in different farms and crops, a rational choice among local models could protect against gross biases. The              between-farm validation  adopted in the present work is similar to a local vs. global chemometric procedure, utilized to manage large  NIR datasets of soils in a better way <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841979924">23</xref>.  The false negative litter-bags, with an S grade of 1, were  mostly concentrated on  two farms. This  may have been the result of  a real inefficacy of the BMS for those particular  management conditions.</p>
        <fig id="idm1848662748">
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Average NIR spectra of the Litter-bags measured by the two             instruments. It is possible to consider  how short but rich the SCIO range is.</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image2.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p>The outlooks on the use of  NIRS  regard both plant tissues and canopies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841949804">37</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841947284">38</xref> as well as  soil quality for precision agriculture purposes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841925532">39</xref>, all of which require new approaches to acquire  soil data on                    landscapes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841923876">40</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841979924">23</xref>. Direct NIR scanning of the soil horizons has  also been proposed as a valid and practical tool to monitor the ontogeny and heterogeneity of detritus in soil, which is useful for the assessment of the carbon and  nitrogen budget of the soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841922724">41</xref>, but even for  the macro components of soil biota: in fact,                             Zormoza et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841919844">42</xref>found very high r-squares for AMF (0.91), Fungi (0.80), Protozoa (0.73), Actinomycetes (0.92) and Bacteria Gram+ (0.91), and also for enzymatic activities, while direct NIR scanning was not so reliable for exchangeable P (0.46).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841073084" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusions </title>
      <p>Obtaining knowledge about  functional soil biota  is expensive, as well as long  and hard to achieve. Moreover, problems in use may arise. Smart sensors that match offline solutions in performance while enabling size reductions, low power consumption, low unit costs, low maintenance costs and data fusion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841915308">43</xref> are currently being investigated, however far from practical solutions. The proposed  rapid comparative method of over 90% success is limited to some Italian farmers    organized  to monitor their progressive results from fields  with  probative results of litter-bags over the years.  A relevant feature is that it would be possible to testify a future yield, even before harvesting. Above all,  this form of indirect certification of  the production process, based on  the microbial soil footprint instead of a direct NIRS discrimination of the products, would eradicate difficult searches for specific markers of the S footprint in the final product. The natural increase  in functional compounds in symbiotic farming products, and mainly in antioxidants, is a scientifically proven fact. However, as we are moving in a context of  biological variability, it is unlikely that there will be no overlapping of one or a few characteristic substances between symbiotic and conventional products that are  statistically evident at the individual level (and not only of averages detected in experimental trials with several replicates).  </p>
      <p>A diffuse web network could capitalise on this diffusive system of harmonized sampling and smart NIRS  analyses, as suggested by  Klakegg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841913508">44</xref>referring toits potential use in future everyday cases.  </p>
      <sec id="idm1841072724">
        <title>Acknowledgements</title>
        <p> The authors wish to thank: S. Capaldo and M. Seminara (Consorzio La Granda Quality, Fossano, CN); R. Bodrero (Commerciale Agricola, Villafalletto, CN); G.L. Malvicini and G.L. Turello (illycaffè S.p.A., Green Coffee Procurement Dept., Trieste);  A. Bevilacqua (AGRION, Manta, CN); G. and M. Bergese (La Corte, Monasterolo di Savigliano, CN); R. Del Negro (Aix en Provence); S. Ravaglia (SIS Foraggere, BO); F. and R. Polo (ATS. Bio contrasto al CoDIRO, Ugento, LE) for their kind support in the setting up of the experiments and in the litter-bag management; thanks are also due to the Fondazione CRT, Torino for the financial support to the scientific activities of the Accademia di Agricoltura di Torino and special thanks to L. Leolini and M. Santoni for their pioneering work.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1842186364">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Reid</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Greene</surname>
            <given-names>S E</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>How Microbes Can Help Feed the World. Report on an American Academy of Microbiology Colloquium Washington,DC//December2012</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2012</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842184060">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Broadfoot</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Researchers are testing more than 2 000 different microbial seed coatings on half a million test plots in the U.S. Scientific American:January6</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842249580">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>French</surname>
            <given-names>K E</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Engineering Mycorrhizal Symbioses to Alter Plant Metabolism and Improve Crop Health. Frontiers</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>in Microbiology. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01403</chapter-title>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>1403</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.01403</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842262324">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Narain</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>The Changing Scenario of Agriculture</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2018</year>
          </date>
          <source>JAR</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>4</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842280684">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Furze</surname>
            <given-names>Martin</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Nasielski</surname>
            <given-names>A R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Thevathasan</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Gordon</surname>
            <given-names>N V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Isaac</surname>
            <given-names>ME AM</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <source>Ecol. Evol</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          <issue>10</issue>
          <fpage>3443</fpage>
          <lpage>3454</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842039044">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Pellegrino</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Öpik</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bonaria</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ercoli</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A meta-analysis of field studies from 1975 to 2013. Soil Biology and</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Biochemistry</source>
          <volume>84</volume>
          <fpage>210</fpage>
          <lpage>217</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842038396">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Mäder</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Inoculation of root microorganisms for sustainable production of high nutritional quality wheat in India</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <source>Soil Biology and Biochemistry</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          <fpage>609</fpage>
          <lpage>619</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842025884">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Uzun</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Improvement of forage yield to improve dairy product quality: mycorrhizal fungi application and differentiation of forage conservation methods. Doctoral thesis</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>84</lpage>
          <institution>University of Naples Federico II</institution>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842026460">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Tripaldi</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Novero</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>Di Giovanni</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Chiarabaglio</surname>
            <given-names>P M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lorenzoni</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Meo</surname>
            <given-names>Zilio D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Palocci</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Balconi</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Aleandri</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Impact of Mycorrhizal Fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms on maize grain yield and chemical composition</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <source>Pak. J. Agri. Sci</source>
          <volume>54</volume>
          <fpage>857</fpage>
          <lpage>865</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842028836">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Sabia</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Claps</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Morone</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>o</surname>
            <given-names>A Brun</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Sepe</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Aleandri</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Field inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhiza on maize (Zeamays L.) under low inputs: preliminary study on quantitative and qualitative aspects</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>It. J. Agr</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <fpage>30</fpage>
          <lpage>33</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842021908">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
            <given-names>N C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wilson</surname>
            <given-names>G W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wilson</surname>
            <given-names>J A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
            <given-names>R M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bowker</surname>
            <given-names>M A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the Law of the Minimum. New Phytol</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <volume>205</volume>
          <fpage>1473</fpage>
          <lpage>84</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842019172">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>X</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>X</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Variation in phosphorus acquisition efficiency among maize varieties as related to mycorrhizal functioning. pHD Thesis</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <source>Wageningen7June2016</source>
          <volume>168</volume>
          <fpage>pp.</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842017084">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Berruti</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lumini</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Balestrini</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bianciotto</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Natural Biofertilizers: Let’s Benefit from Past Successes. Frontiers in</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Microbiology</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          <fpage>1559</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842008348">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Thirkell</surname>
            <given-names>T J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Cameron</surname>
            <given-names>D D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hodge</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Resolving the ‘nitrogen paradox’ of arbuscular mycorrhizas: fertilization with organic matter brings considerable benefits for plant nutrition and growth.doi: 10.1111/pce.12667. Plant, Cell and Environment</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12667</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842005180">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Masoero</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Giovannetti</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>In vivo Stem pH can testify the acidification of the maize treated by mycorrhizal and microbial consortium</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences</source>
          <volume>3</volume>
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          <lpage>30</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842003812">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Nuti</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Giovannetti</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Borderline Products between Bio-fertilizers/ Bio-effectors and Plant Protectants: The Role of Microbial Consortia</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <fpage>305</fpage>
          <lpage>315</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842000356">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Raiola</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Tenore</surname>
            <given-names>G C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Petito</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ciampaglia</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ritieni</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Improving of nutraceutical features of many important Mediterranean vegetables by inoculation with a new commercial product</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Current Pharm Biotech</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          <fpage>738</fpage>
          <lpage>746</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841997620">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Migliorini</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Torri</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Whittaker</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Moschini</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Benedettelli</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Masoero</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Old and new common wheat (TriticumaestivumL.) varieties in organic: connecting agronomic, microorganism, phytochemical and bread sensory characteristics</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2018</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842011084">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Claps</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Sabia</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rufrano</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Sepe</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Morone</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Paladino</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Fedele</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>In vivo digestibility of different forage species inoculated with Arbuscular mycorrhiza spp</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2013</year>
          </date>
          <source>Ital J Anim Sci,12:s1,8(C-019)</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841985972">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Chiariotti</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Zilio</surname>
            <given-names>D M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Contò</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>Di Giovanni</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Tripaldi</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effects of mycorrhized maize grain on milk and on rumen environment of Italian Holstein dairy cows</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Ital J Anim Sci,14:s1</source>
          <fpage>144</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841985612">
        <label>21.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Peiretti</surname><given-names>P G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tassone</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Masoero</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Barbera</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><article-title>Chemical and physical properties of meat of bulls and steers fed Mycorrhizal or Conventional corn. Agricultural Research Updates:</article-title><date><year>2018</year></date>
in press


</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841982156">
        <label>22.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Vurukonda</surname>
            <given-names>SSK</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Giovanardi</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Stefani</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Symbiotic Agriculture: increasing knowledge on the mode of action of beneficial microorganisms</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <publisher-name>Poster</publisher-name>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841979924">
        <label>23.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Genot</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Colinet</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bock</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Vanvyve</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Reusen</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Dardenne</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for estimating soil characteristics valuable in the diagnosis of soil fertility</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          <fpage>117</fpage>
          <lpage>138</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841991372">
        <label>24.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Crossley</surname>
            <given-names>D A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hoglund</surname>
            <given-names>M P</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>A litter-bag method for the study of micro- arthropods inhabiting leaf litter</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1962</year>
          </date>
          <source>Ecology</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          <fpage>571</fpage>
          <lpage>573</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841988636">
        <label>25.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Mincheva</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Barni</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Varese</surname>
            <given-names>G C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Brusa</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Cerabolini</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Siniscalco</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Litter quality, decomposition rates and saprotrophic mycoflora inFallopiajaponica(Houtt.)Ronsedecraeneand in adjacent native grassland vegetation</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2014</year>
          </date>
          <source>Acta Oecologica</source>
          <volume>54</volume>
          <fpage>29</fpage>
          <lpage>35</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841973460">
        <label>26.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Battaglini</surname>
            <given-names>L M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Renna</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lussiana</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lombardi</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Probo</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Masoero</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Smart NIR on frozen milk samples can discriminate grass-fed from conventional milk</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <source>It. Journal Anim. Sci. ASPA 2017</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>209</fpage>
          <lpage>210</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841968492">
        <label>27.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Candellone</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Peiretti</surname>
            <given-names>P G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Masoero</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Meineri</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Efficiency of in vivo ear flap NIR scan in the detection of differences related to diet or pregnancy status in young rabbit does</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <source>It. Journal Anim. Sci. ASPA2017</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>219</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841965540">
        <label>28.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Santoni</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Utilizzo del metodo litter-bag per lo studio del processo di decomposizione di diverse specie daovescio nel dispositivo sperimentale Montepaldi Long Term Experiment (MOLTE) per il confronto di sistemi colturali biologici e convenzionali. Tesi Magistrale Università di Firenze Anno Accademico2013/2014:</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>131</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841965180">
        <label>29.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Tassone</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Masoero</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Peiretti</surname>
            <given-names>P G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Vibrational spectroscopy to predict in vitro digestibility and the maturity index of different forage crops during the growing cycle and after freeze- or oven-drying treatment. Animal Feed Sci</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2014</year>
          </date>
          <source>Techn</source>
          <volume>194</volume>
          <fpage>12</fpage>
          <lpage>25</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841961724">
        <label>30.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <chapter-title>SAS-STAT 9.0 software, SAS Institute, Inc</chapter-title>
          <publisher-loc>Cary, NC, the USA</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841958988">
        <label>31.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Cucu</surname>
            <given-names>M A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Said-Pullicino</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Maurino</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bonifacio</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Romani</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Celi</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Influence of redox conditions and rice straw incorporation on nitrogen availability in fertilized paddy soils. Biology and fertility of soils 50:</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2014</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>755</fpage>
          <lpage>764</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841946708">
        <label>32.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>G</surname>
            <given-names>I Agren</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hyvonen</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>L Berglund</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>E Hobbie</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Estimating the critical N:C from litter decomposition data and its relation to soil organic matter stoichiometry</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2013</year>
          </date>
          <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source>
          <volume>67</volume>
          <fpage>312</fpage>
          <lpage>318</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841943180">
        <label>33.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Gilbert</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Environment: the disappearing nutrient</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <source>Nature</source>
          <volume>461</volume>
          <fpage>716</fpage>
          <lpage>718</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841941236">
        <label>34.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Leolini</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Climatic and biodiversity effects on litter decomposition in semi-natural grassland. TesiMagistrale Università di Firenze Anno Accademico2012/2013:</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2014</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>65</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841939724">
        <label>35.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Gillon</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Joffre</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ibrahima</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Can litter decomposability be predicted by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy?</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1999</year>
          </date>
          <source>Ecology</source>
          <volume>80</volume>
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          <lpage>186</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841953692">
        <label>36.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Dilly</surname>
            <given-names>O</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Estimating soil microbial activity. In: Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality@CAB International</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <source>(eds J. Bloem et al.):</source>
          <fpage>114</fpage>
          <lpage>116</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841949804">
        <label>37.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>M Moges</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Raun</surname>
            <given-names>W R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Mullen</surname>
            <given-names>R W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Freeman</surname>
            <given-names>K W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
            <given-names>G V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Solie</surname>
            <given-names>J B</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Evaluation of green, red, and near infrared bands for predicting winter wheat biomass, nitrogen uptake, and final grain yield</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of plant nutrition</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          <fpage>1431</fpage>
          <lpage>1441</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841947284">
        <label>38.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Peiretti</surname>
            <given-names>P G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Tassone</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Masoero</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Lipid maturity trend in crops as characterized by α-linolenic acid decay and by NIRS study</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Environmental d an Agricultural Sciences</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <fpage>4</fpage>
          <lpage>16</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841925532">
        <label>39.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Adamchuk</surname>
            <given-names>Hummel JW</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Morgan</surname>
            <given-names>M T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Upadhyaya</surname>
            <given-names>S K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <source>Computers and Electronics in Agriculture</source>
          <volume>44</volume>
          <fpage>71</fpage>
          <lpage>91</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841923876">
        <label>40.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>McCarty</surname>
            <given-names>G W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Reeves</surname>
            <given-names>J B</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Comparison of near infrared and mid infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for field-scale measurement of soil fertility parameters. Soil Sci</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <volume>171</volume>
          <fpage>94</fpage>
          <lpage>102</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841922724">
        <label>41.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Cécillon</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Brun</surname>
            <given-names>J J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): a practical tool for the assessment of soil carbon and nitrogen budget.R,Jandl&amp;M.Olsson.COST Action 639: Greenhouse-gas Budget of Soils Under Changing Climate and Land Use (BurnOut)., Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape (BFW)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2007</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Diverse Veroffentlichungen Nr. 40.&amp;lt;hal-00396317&gt;</chapter-title>
          <fpage>103</fpage>
          <lpage>110</lpage>
          <publisher-loc>Vienna :</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841919844">
        <label>42.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Zornoza</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Guerrero</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Mataix-Solera</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>M Scow</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Arcenegui</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Mataix-Beneyto</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Near infrared spectroscopy for determination of various physical, chemical and biochemical properties in Mediterranean soils</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <source>Soil Biology and Biochemistry</source>
          <volume>40</volume>
          <fpage>1923</fpage>
          <lpage>1930</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841915308">
        <label>43.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>O’Mahony</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Murphy</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Panduru</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Riordan</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Walsh</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Smart sensors for process analytical technology</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>In Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM),2016 IEEE International Conference on</chapter-title>
          <fpage>1005</fpage>
          <lpage>1010</lpage>
          <publisher-name>IEEE</publisher-name>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841913508">
        <label>44.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Klakegg</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Goncalves</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hosio</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Kostakos</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>(Sep2016).Instrumenting smartphones with portable NIRS</article-title>
          <chapter-title>In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct ACM</chapter-title>
          <fpage>618</fpage>
          <lpage>623</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
