<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2691-6622</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJAR-23-4637</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2691-6622.ijar-23-4637</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effect of adding different levels of soaked pigeon pea seeds (Cajanus cajan L) on the Growth and Feed Utilization Efficiency of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings.</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Hassan</surname>
            <given-names>M. Yagoub</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1840594692">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1840596276">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Abdul</surname>
            <given-names>Naser S. Ali</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1840594692">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Rufida</surname>
            <given-names>M. Mohammed</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1840594692">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Mubarak</surname>
            <given-names>M. Ali</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1840594692">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1840594692">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Science College of Animal Production Science and Technology, Sudan University of Science and Technology P.O.BOX204, Khartoum North, Sudan</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1840596276">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>Corresponding author</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Eman</surname>
            <given-names>Hashem Radwan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1840439620">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1840439620">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Damanhour University.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>
  Hassan M. Yagoub, <addr-line>Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Science College of Animal Production Science and Technology, Sudan University of Science and Technology P.O. BOX204, Khartoum North, Sudan</addr-line>, <email>hassanwildlif@gmail.com</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1841546540">
          <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-12-14">
        <day>14</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>24</fpage>
      <lpage>33</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>14</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>©</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Hassan M. Yagoub, et al.</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org/ijar/article/2045">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org/ijar/article/2045</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of socked pigeon pea seed meal on Growth and Food Utilization Efficiency of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fingerlings. 120 fish the weight and length average (3.4±0.04g and 3.2±0.00cm) were randomly distributed in 12 plastic Tanks (Aquarium) 36L according to the complete randomization, allocated to a represent four treatments (T0, T1, T2, and T3) of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fingerlings. four feeds were prepared in pellet form which consisted of 0%, 25%, 50% and 75% pigeon pea seed meal as replacement of fish meal. All diets contents 30% protein. Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fingerlings were fed at the rate of 5% of their body weight. The result showed significant variation (P &lt; 0.05) in final body weight, weight gain (WG), daily weight growth (DWG), Specific Growth Rate (SGR), and Food Conversion Ratio (FCR) among treatments. But, high SGR in T0 (control) and the best FCR were obtained at T 0% pigeon pea seed meal. Over all, best growth performance was observed in fish fed diet T1 (25%). The best performing fish’s final weight, DWG, SGR and FCR were 9.46±0.33g, 0.13±0.01g/day, 2.93±0.73% /day and 1.49±0.30 respectively. On the other hand, there was high significant variation (P &lt; 0.05) in survival rate were obtained at T2 (50%). this study recommend that a diet containing 25% Pigeon pea seed meal for juvenile Nile tilapia is optimum in terms of growth performance and profitability, and does not impact water quality and plankton abundance in plastic Tanks (Aquarium) culture system. </p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Oreochromis niloticus</kwd>
        <kwd>Growth performance</kwd>
        <kwd>feed utilization</kwd>
        <kwd>pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L).</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="0"/>
        <table-count count="7"/>
        <page-count count="10"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1840442500" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Food security is a pressing global issue as the human population is projected to reach between 7.5 and 10.5 billion by 2050 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841393012">34</xref>. With capture fisheries becoming increasingly unsustainable due to overfishing, aquaculture is expected to overtake capture 2 fisheries in supplying the world’s protein requirements in the future <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841459700">17</xref>. Indeed, aquaculture is the fastest growing food production sector in the world, with an average annual growth rate of 6.3% since the year 2000 (average 8.8% per year between1980 and 2010) and currently accounts for approximately 47% of the world’s fish supply <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841459700">17</xref>. During the same period, total aquaculture production in Africa increased at a rate of 11% per annum. Ponds remain the most common                      tilapia production system in Africa, contributing about 38– 93% of total tilapia production from aquaculture in many Africa countries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841467188">14</xref>. Tilapia is a hardy prolific, fast growing  tropical fish, and it can               survive on a diversity of food. Algae are probably their most common food in the wild. On fish farms they are fed a highprotein pelleted feed. They can be fed by hand or with sprinkler mechanism, and             generally fed twice per day <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841455956">18</xref>. Sudan has often been described as the largest country in Africa and at present the population is about 40 million people. The Sudanese consume a substantial amount of meat in their diet, but the country demand for fish is not yet satisfied the present per capita consumption at 1.38 kg/year  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841374612">36</xref>.This level is low when compared to the neighboring countries. Aquaculture is the fastest growing sector of world human food production and has an annual increase of about 10% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841464308">15</xref>. To sustain such a high rate of growth a matching increase in fish feed production is imperative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841660940">2</xref>. The feed is the most expensive component in the intensive aquaculture where it represents over 50% of the operating cost, moreover protein itself  represents about 50% of feed cost , therefore the selection o f proper quality of dietary protein is a  necessity for successful fish culture practices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841494556">12</xref> . Fish meal is considered the most desirable animal protein  ingredient in aquaculture feeds because of its high protein              content, balance amino acid profile, high digestibility and palatability, and as a source of essential fatty acid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841436964">20</xref>. Fish nutritionists have made several attempts to partially or totally replace fish meal with less expensive and locally available protein sources. In this aspect, several feed ingredients have been investigated in an attempt to find substitutes for fish meal in the diets of tilapia. These include animal protein sources such as, the fishery byproducts, shrimps meal, and feather, bone meal and blood meal. Plant         protein sources including soy bean meal cotton seed meal, ground nut meal, wheat bran meal, sunflower cake and Pigeon peas plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841400716">31</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841492468">10</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841470572">13</xref>. Cotton seed, groundnut and sun flower cakes are one of the best plant protein sources for tilapia in developing countries due to its high availability, relatively low price, good protein content not less than 26.54% depending on processing methods and amino acid 3 profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841461284">16</xref>. Replacement of  fishmeal by cheaper  ingredients of either animal or vegetable origin in aquatic animal feed is necessary because of the rising cost and uncertain availability of fishmeal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841424332">25</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841435740">21</xref>.These feeds are not only considerably cheaper than fish meal but also enjoy high availability and accessibility in certain regions of the world. Soy bean meal and wheat bran meal has been used as a protein source in diets of various fish  species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841433868">22</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841376196">35</xref>. Nevertheless the use of Pigeon peas is limited by the presence of ant- nutritional factors such as protease inhibitors, Amylase inhibitors, Oligosaccharides and poly phenol; the current study was designed to assess the growth performance and feed utilization of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fed diets containing Pigeon pea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841767268">4</xref> as replacer of fishmeal.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1840442788" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Material and Methods</title>
      <sec id="idm1840440772">
        <title>Fish collection</title>
        <p>Total number of (200) Juveniles of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) with an average initial body weight of (3.4±0.01 g), and total length (3.2 ± 0.04 cm) were purchased from private fish farm of        Hussein Fadol, Soba West Agriculture Scheme, and transferred to the fisheries laboratory in Sudan    University of Science and Technology, College of Animal Production Science and Technology,         Department of Fisheries and Wildlife using suitable gillnet and distributed into experimental plastic Tanks (Aquarium). Aerators were used for aerating the water of experimental aquaria. The pH,           Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature were recorded every day/week, using pH electronic meter (model, No. 201) and thermometer. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840411292">
        <title>Collection of ingredients</title>
        <p> Pigeon peas, Wheat bran, Groundnut Cake, sorghum and fishmeal were acquired from halt kuku Market and were manually sorted to remove impurities. The premix (Mineral Mix) was obtained from livestock shop. Manufactured by using electrical balance (Model; 2003, Max; 200g cl; 0.001g, AC; 220W/50HZ, S/N; 11g, SF; 400). </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840412084">
        <title>Processing of ingredients</title>
        <p>In attempting to remove anti- nutritional factors, seeds were soaked by dipping them in water in plastic container for 24 hours with soaking ratio of 100 g/300 ml (1:3w/v) at room temperature. After soaking, the seeds were oven dried at 60°C overnight. Pigeon peas were milled by using milling machine and stored in name labelled containers prior to analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840410356">
        <title>Chemical composition</title>
        <p>Chemical composition to determine composition of raw and soaked Pigeon pea seeds was carried out according to standard method adopted by Association of Official Analytical Chemists <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841519796">5</xref></p>
        <p>DM= Dry Matter. CP= Crude Protein. EE= Ether Extract. CF= Crude Fibre.NFE= Nitrogen Free Extract. <italic>Moisture content </italic>was determined by drying samples in an oven at 70°C for 48 hours. <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841304124">Table 1</xref></p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1841304124">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Proximate composition of Pigeon peas (Cajanus Cajan L) DM%</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Type</td>
                <td>DM</td>
                <td>CP%</td>
                <td>EE%</td>
                <td>CF%</td>
                <td>Ash</td>
                <td>NFE</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>raw</td>
                <td>91.63</td>
                <td>20.13</td>
                <td>2.42</td>
                <td>10.50</td>
                <td>3.47</td>
                <td>55.11</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Soaked</td>
                <td>79.22</td>
                <td>18.40</td>
                <td>1.99</td>
                <td>3.98</td>
                <td>2.43</td>
                <td>35.66</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><italic>Crude protein </italic>was determined according to Kjeldah method. Samples were digested in concentrated         sulphuric acid by a digester, distillate and titrated to obtained nitrogen. Crude protein was obtained by multiplying nitrogen content with conversion factor of 6.25. </p>
        <p><italic>Crude </italic><italic>fibre</italic>was determined by digesting a sample with weak base preceded by weak acid. Ankom 220 Fibre analyzer was used to determine the crude fibre. </p>
        <p><italic>Crude lipid </italic>was determined after soxhlet extraction of dried samples with 1.25% H2SO and 1.25% NaOH Ash  content was determined by calcinations method. Samples which were previously oven dried were put in crucible and heat in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 3 hours and then cooled before weighing. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840363708">
        <title>Experimental diet formulation</title>
        <p>Diets were formulated to replace 0% (control), 25%, 50%, and 75% of fishmeal. And give up to 30% crude protein. During compounding of diets, the weighed proportions of dry milled ingredients were carefully mixed by hand before adding water. The mixture was then passed through meat machine with 0.5 mm sieve size to make pellets. Pellets were then dried by passing in the oven for 6 hours at 40°C and then spread on the floor under room temperature for one week prior to packaging. Composition of     experimental Diets (g/100 g diet) is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841245228">Table 2</xref>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1841245228">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Composition of the Experimental Diets /100g.</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td> Ingredients     Treatments</td>
                <td>T (0%)</td>
                <td>T (25%)</td>
                <td>T (50%)</td>
                <td>T (75%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fish Meal %</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pigeon pea %</td>
                <td>0.0</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>18</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Groundnut Cake %</td>
                <td>30.4</td>
                <td>35</td>
                <td>39</td>
                <td>43.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Wheat Bran %</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>22</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dora fitrita %</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>13.4</td>
                <td>11.4</td>
                <td>10</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Mineral Mix %</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Vegetable Oil %</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Vitamin mixture %</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                </th>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                  <bold>crude</bold>
                  <bold>protein</bold>
                  <bold>intake</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>30.0±0.01</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>30.2±0.07</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>30.1±0.05</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>30.0±0.01</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="idm1840322908">
              <label/>
              <p>1-Fishmeal 49% CP; Pigeon pea 18.4% CP; Groundnut Cake 44.8% CP; Dora fitrita 11.5% CP and Wheat bran 15.7%. 2-Mineral mixture (g/100g dry diet) calcium biphosphate 13.57; calcium lactate 32.69; ferric citrate 02.97; magnesium sulphate 13.20; potassium phosphate (dibasic) 23.98; sodium biphosphate 08.72; sodium chloride 04.35; almunium chloride.6H2O 0.0154; potassium iodide 0.015; cuprous chloride 0.010; mangnous sulphate H20 0.080; cobalt chloride. 6H2O 0.100; zinc sulphate. 7H2O 0.40 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841440564">19</xref> 3-Vitamin mixture (g/100 dry diet) choline chloride 0.500;inositol 0.200; ascorbic acid 0.100; niacin 0.075; calcium pantothenate 0.05; riboflavin 0.02; menadione 0.004; pyridoxine hydrochloride 0.005; thiamin hydrochloride 0.005; folic acid 0.0015; biotin 0.000 5; alpha-tocopherol  0.04; vitamin B12 0.00001; LobaChemie, India <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841440564">19</xref>.</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840321972">
        <title>Experimental design and feeding regime</title>
        <p>The experimental design was a completely randomized design (CRD). 120 Nile tilapia fingerlings with initial average body weight and length (3.4±0.01g) and 3.2±0.00 respectively, were randomly distributed in plastic Tanks (Aquarium) with a capacity of 20 litres at a stocking density of 10 Nile tilapia per bucket. Fish were fed four times a day according their appetite; diets were given at periods (8:30, 11:00, 14:00 and 17:00 o clock), at 5% of body weight throughout the experimental period. The quantity of feed was adjusted weekly based on the weight of fish to avoid feed wastage and deterioration of water quality  parameters (dissolved oxygen, ammonia, temperature and PH). A Remaining feeds at the end of the week were weighed and used to estimate feed intake. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840337236">
        <title>Handling of experimental fish</title>
        <p>Fish were weighed prior to the start of each experiment to obtain fish of consistent size and weight. A top pan balance was used in weighing procedures. Fish were acclimated to 6 Experimental environment for 10 days and fed control diet. After the acclimation period fish were netted from each plastic bucket using a fine mesh hand net and total weighed. The dietary treatments were at random assigned to the plastic buckets. Total weighing of experimental fish was done weekly throughout the experiment. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840337164">
        <title>Data collection and computation</title>
        <p>The study lasted for 60 days during which fish were fed the experimental diets containing Pigeon pea seed meal. Parameters measured were bulk initial weight, bulk final weight and feed intake. Etch 10 days weight gain was measured to monitor growth while other parameters were calculated as described below: </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840337884">
        <title>Specific Growth</title>
        <p>Specific growth rate (SGR) (% day (SGR) (% day-1) % = {In Wt<sub>2</sub>- In Wt<sub>1</sub>/t<sub>2</sub>– t<sub>1</sub>} × 100 </p>
        <p>Average Daily weight gain </p>
        <p>Average Daily weight gain (ADWG) (day-1) = (Wt<sub>2</sub>– Wt<sub>1</sub>)/ t.</p>
        <p> Where: </p>
        <p>Wt<sub>2</sub>= final weight (g) at time t<sub>2</sub> (end of experiment) </p>
        <p>Wt<sub>1</sub>= Initial weight (g) at time t<sub>1</sub> (beginning of experiment) and In = Natural logarithm. </p>
        <p>t= time (day) </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840304548">
        <title>Feed utilization</title>
        <p>Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = Weight of food fed (g) /increased weight (g) Feed intake (FI) (g day-1)) = Total feed intake /number of days </p>
        <p>Protein productive value (PPV %) = (P2 – PI) ×100 / Protein intake (g) </p>
        <p>Where: </p>
        <p>P2: Protein content in fish carcass at the end; PI: Protein content at the start. </p>
        <p>Survival rate (SR) = {N<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>1</sub>} × 100 </p>
        <p>Where: </p>
        <p>N<sub>2</sub>-Number of fish at the end of the experiment </p>
        <p>N<sub>1</sub>- Number of fish at the beginning of the experiment .</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840301884">
        <title>Data analysis</title>
        <p>Data collected from this experiment were subjected to one - way analysis of variance (ANOVA).     Comparisons of treatment means were done by LSD Honest at 5% level of significance. Analyses were performed using SPSS software version16. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1840303036" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="idm1840302820">
        <title>Growth performance Pigeon pea</title>
        <p>The study demonstrated that there were significant differences (p≤0.05) in the (WG g/Fish), (DWG g/Fish) and (SGR) of mono-sex Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>Niloticus</italic>) fed on diets with partially replaced by Pigeon pea. The growth parameters were analyzed and presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841139252">Table 3</xref>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1841139252">
          <label>Table 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Growth performance of Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) fed diets containing different levels of Pigeon pea seed meal.</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>        Treats              Parameters</td>
                <td>Initial weight</td>
                <td>final weight</td>
                <td>WG</td>
                <td>DWG g/d</td>
                <td>SGR%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>0%</td>
                <td>3.4±0.01ᵃ</td>
                <td>8.93±0.44ᵃ</td>
                <td>6.63±0.73ᵃ</td>
                <td>0.13±0.01ᵃ</td>
                <td>2.93±0.73ᵃ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>25%</td>
                <td>3.4±0.03ᵃ</td>
                <td>9.46±0.33ᵃ</td>
                <td>5.70±0.53ᵃ</td>
                <td>0.11±0.01ᵃ</td>
                <td>2.40±0.53ᵃ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>50%</td>
                <td>3.3±0.05ᵃ</td>
                <td>8.10±0.28ᵃᵇ</td>
                <td>4.08±0.08ᵃᵇ</td>
                <td>0.08±0.00ᵇ</td>
                <td>0.78±0.08ᵇ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>75%</td>
                <td>3.3±0.06ᵃ</td>
                <td>7.33±0.44ᵇ</td>
                <td>3.83±0.03ᵇ</td>
                <td>0.07±0.00ᵇ</td>
                <td>0.53±0.03ᵇ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sig.</td>
                <td>Ns</td>
                <td>*</td>
                <td>*</td>
                <td>*</td>
                <td>*</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="idm1840269404">
              <label/>
              <p>WG = weight gain, DWG = daily weight growth and SGR%= specific growth rate Data are re resented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error.</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840268324">
              <label/>
              <p>Sig= Significant Ns= no Significant</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840266236">
              <label/>
              <p>a,b,c Means in the same Column with the same letter are Significantly different at (p≤0.05).</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840267820">
        <title>The increment weight</title>
        <table-wrap id="idm1841093628">
          <label>Table 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> The Increment Weight of Mono-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (g/Fish) as affected with Pigeon pea Incorporation in Diets/Days.</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Diets %</td>
                <td colspan="7">Weight of fish (g) at different times</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td>0 times</td>
                <td>10 days</td>
                <td>20 days</td>
                <td>30 days</td>
                <td>40 days</td>
                <td>50 days</td>
                <td>Increment (g)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T 0.0</td>
                <td>3.4±0.01ᵃ</td>
                <td>4.37±0.29ᵃᵇ</td>
                <td>5.60±0.26ᵃ</td>
                <td>7.35±0.27ᵇ</td>
                <td>8.82±0.24ᵃ</td>
                <td>8.83±0.44ᵃ</td>
                <td>5.79±0.41</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T 25</td>
                <td>3.4±0.03ᵃ</td>
                <td>4.74±0.33ᵃ</td>
                <td>6.36±0.27ᵃ</td>
                <td>8.06±0.23ᵃ</td>
                <td>9.04±0.12ᵃ</td>
                <td>9.46±0.33ᵃ</td>
                <td>6.06±0.30</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T 50</td>
                <td>3.3±0.05ᵃ</td>
                <td>4.14±0.04ᵇ</td>
                <td>4.60±0.27ᵇ</td>
                <td>7.38±0.26ᶜ</td>
                <td>7.60±0.26ᵇ</td>
                <td>8.10±0.28ᵃᵇ</td>
                <td>4.80±0.23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T 75</td>
                <td>3.3±0.06ᵃ</td>
                <td>4.06±0.02ᵇ</td>
                <td>4.78±0.08ᵇ</td>
                <td>5.68±0.36ᵈ</td>
                <td>5.91±0.41ᶜ</td>
                <td>7.33±0.44ᵇ</td>
                <td>4.03±0.38</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="idm1840225380">
              <label/>
              <p>Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error.  </p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840225020">
              <label/>
              <p>Means in the same row with the same letter are not significant difference (P&gt;0.05)</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841093628">Table 4</xref>: show that the result of mean ± SD of increment weight of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fed on the experimental diet T0, T1, T2 and T3 throughout 60 days the increase in T0 (3.4±0.01 to 8.83±0.44), T1(3.3±0.03 to 9.46±0.33),T2 (3.3±0.05 to 8.10±0.28) and T3 (3.3±0.06 to 7.33±0.44). </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840224228">
        <title>Feed Efficiency</title>
        <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841043324">Table 5</xref>. Indicate that the mean ± SD of feed intake, feed conversion ratio, protein productive value, condition factor (K %) and survival rate. The lower significant value of feed intake (The death fish is not lower values of the mortality rate excluded) was (5.88±0.00 and 6.79±0.00) was obtained by fish diet T0 (giving low FCR), and T2 (which gives   high FCR). The high (p&lt;0.05) value of the K was (1.89 and 1.46) in T3and T0. The high survival rate was in T2 and T3.</p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1841043324">
          <label>Table 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Growth and Feed Utilization Efficiency of Mono-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus) Fingerlings Fed the Experimental Diets.</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>parameters   Treats</td>
                <td>T0 (0.0%)</td>
                <td>T1 (25%)</td>
                <td>T2 (50%)</td>
                <td>T3 (75%)</td>
                <td>Sig</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Feed intake (g)</td>
                <td>55.84±0.00ᶜ</td>
                <td>65.29±0.00ᵃ</td>
                <td>59.79±0.00ᵇ</td>
                <td>53.15±0.00ᵇ</td>
                <td>*</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FCR (g)</td>
                <td>0.86±0.85ᶜ</td>
                <td>1.20±0.19ᵇ</td>
                <td>1.49±0.30ᵃ</td>
                <td>1.12±0.10ᵇ</td>
                <td>*</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PPV (g)</td>
                <td>39.33±0.19ᵃ</td>
                <td>34.33±0.00ᵃ</td>
                <td>33.66±0.00ᵇ</td>
                <td>29.00±0.19ᶜ</td>
                <td>*</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>K (%)</td>
                <td>1.26±0.16<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>1.19±0.16<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>1.21±0.11<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>1.29±0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>NS</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SR (%)</td>
                <td>98.27±2.9<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>95.10±3.8 <sup>b</sup></td>
                <td>90.12±3.6<sup>c</sup></td>
                <td>91.59±6.6 <sup>c</sup></td>
                <td>*</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="idm1840191412">
              <label/>
              <p>FCR =feed conversion ratio, PPV = Protein productive value, K (%) = condition factor, SR (%) = survival rate.</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840190764">
              <label/>
              <p>Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error.</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840190116">
              <label/>
              <p>a,b,c Means in the same Column with the same letter are Significant different at (p≤0.05) NS: No Significant different at (p≥0.05)</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840191556">
        <title>Feeding Rate (Regime %)</title>
        <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1840981420">Table 6</xref>: indicate that the mean ± SD of feeding regime % for Mono-sex Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fed the experimental diets/ Sample decreasing of feeding intake as feed rate decrease, however the initial highest feed intake was in T2 (13.80 ±0.58) and T0 (13.78 ±1.16), Although they showed the lower percentage at the final feeding</p>
        <p>regime T3 (2.50±0.40) and T0 (4.88±0.95) respectively (the differences was due to electricity problems, losing their appetite and at the end the mortality rate increased)<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1840981420">Table 6</xref></p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1840981420">
          <label>
    Table 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Feeding Rate (Regime %) Intake by Mono-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis 
    Niloticus
    ) / Sample.
  </title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Diets</td>
                <td colspan="5">Feed intake (%) at different sample</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td>1(15%)</td>
                <td>2(12%)</td>
                <td>3(9%)</td>
                <td>4(6%)</td>
                <td>5(3%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T 0(0.0)</td>
                <td>13.78<sup>c</sup></td>
                <td>14.15<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>12.25ᵇ</td>
                <td>9.78ᶜ</td>
                <td>5.88ᶜ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T1 (25%)</td>
                <td>12.80 <sup>d</sup></td>
                <td>13.86<sup>b</sup></td>
                <td>15.39ᵃ</td>
                <td>15.40ᵃ</td>
                <td>7.84ᵃ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T2 (50%)</td>
                <td>13.80<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>14.17<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>12.63ᶜ</td>
                <td>12.63ᵇ</td>
                <td>6.56ᵇ</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T3 (75%)</td>
                <td>12.99 <sup>b</sup></td>
                <td>13.98<sup>b</sup></td>
                <td>10.48ᵈ</td>
                <td>10.20ᵈ</td>
                <td>5.50ᵈ</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="idm1840153268">
              <label/>
              <p>Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840150460">
              <label/>
              <p>a,b,c Means in the same row with the same letter are not significantly different (P&gt;0.05)</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1840150748">
        <title>Length during Experiment</title>
        <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1840930764">Table 7</xref>:  indicated that  mean  ± SD of  the initial length (cm)  and  final  length  (cm) of Mono-sex  Nile  tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis</italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fed  0%,  25%,  50%  and  75%  diets  showed  no significant differences (P&gt;0.05) initial length and showed the significance  (P&lt;0.05) in final length.</p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1840930764">
          <label>Table 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Length of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) During the Experiment</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Parameters  Treats</td>
                <td>T0 (0.0%)</td>
                <td>T1 (25%)</td>
                <td>T2 (50%)</td>
                <td>T3 (75%)</td>
                <td>Sig</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>IL (cm)</td>
                <td>3.4±0.00<sup>b</sup></td>
                <td>3.5±0.00<sup>a</sup></td>
                <td>3.3±0.00<sup>c</sup></td>
                <td>3.4±0.00<sup>b</sup></td>
                <td>NS</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FL (Cm)</td>
                <td>8.83±0.44ᵃ</td>
                <td>9.16±0.33ᵃ</td>
                <td>8.50±0.28ᵃᵇ</td>
                <td>7.33±0.44ᵇ</td>
                <td>*</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="idm1840137788">
              <label/>
              <p>Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard deviation.</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840134692">
              <label/>
              <p>a,b,c Means in the same row with the same letter are Significant different at (p≤0.05) NS: NO Significant different at (p≥0.05)</p>
            </fn>
            <fn id="idm1840134980">
              <label/>
              <p>IL = initial length, FL = final length.</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1840134332" sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of adding pigeon pea seeds of four experimental diets (0%, 25%, 50% and 75%) containing socked pigeon peas seed meal, as replacement of fish meal on the growth Performance and carcass composition of <italic>Oreochromis</italic><italic>niloticus</italic> under culture conditions. The  different  physic-chemical parameters  of  the  surface  water  were  within  the  accepted range  where  tilapia can achieve  maximum growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841508812">9</xref>. They were also comparable with the previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841455956">18</xref> in Lake Kuriftu.  Moreover, no significant variation was detected between the two sites. This suggested that the dietary crude protein does not negatively affect the water quality  at  experimental  scale  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841444092">23</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841420876">26</xref>. most  tilapia  utilize  starch  efficiently  from  22  to  46% dietary  starch  while  22%  considered  as  optimum  level  for  juvenile  tilapia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841393012">34</xref>.Processing of Pigeon peas using cold water led to the reduction of nutrients due to Nutritional change which caused losses of water soluble components such as carbohydrates and nitrogen. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841398052">33</xref> Detailed decrease in dry matter of beans after soaking. The present result showed the Low crude protein in soaked Pigeon peas than in raw Pigeon peas with agree that was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841427860">24</xref> due to leaching during soaking. but contrasting these results is <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841668292">3</xref> who detailed that protein content of Jack Bean Carnavalia ensiformis Seeds increased from 88-92% after 96 hours of soaking in water. Badifu attributed increased protein when kernels were soaked in cold water for 48 hours. However crude protein obtained in this study was not contrary to results reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841400716">31</xref> who reported decreased crude protein as a result of soaking sorghum cultivars in cold water. Moreover, processing of Pigeon peas by using cold water led to the reduction of crude lipid. Nevertheless it is within the value reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841404748">30</xref> when two groups (A and B) of Mucuna seeds were soaked in water for 12 and 24 hours. Low content a of ash in the soaked Pigeon peas could be explained by leaching of minerals despite the fact that it is still within the values reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841416988">28</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841767268">4</xref> studies Pigeon peas are known to contain mineral such Iron, Calcium, Manganese, magnesium and Zinc which tend to dissolve and hence leaching into soaking medium during the whole process of soaking. Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841093628">Table 4</xref>.shaw Growth performance and feed utilization of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) Juvenile fed diets containing soaked Pigeon peas seed meal as replacement of fish meal. The lower significant value of feed  intake  (5.88±0.00 and  6.79±0.00)  was  obtained  by  fish  diet T0 (gave  low  FCR), and  T2 (which  gave  high  FCR). The highest (p&lt;0.01) value of the specific growth was (2.93±0.73 and 2.40±0.53) in T0 and T1. The highest survival rate was in T2 and T1. But generally the growth was not optimum in T2 and T3 fed diets containing (50% and 75%) soaked Pigeon peas seed meal. Poor palatability accounts for feed rejection and or poor feed intake. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841505788">7</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841418932">27</xref> explained that Poor feed intake led to starvation of Chinook salmon fed diets reached in ant nutritional. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841660004">1</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841503196">8</xref> reported poor intake in Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis </italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fed diets containing tannin while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1841518644">6</xref> reported similar phenomenon, which has occurred in common, carps. Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841043324">Table 5</xref>.  indicated that  mean  ± SD of  the initial length (cm)  and  final  length  (cm) of Mono-sex  Nile  tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis</italic><italic>niloticus</italic>) fed  control,  25%,  50%  and  75%  diets  showed  no significant differences (P&gt;0.05) initial length and showed the significance  (P&lt;0.05) in final length. Fish fed soaked Pigeon peas seed meal 25% diets recorded high growth and feed intake next to those fed the control diet. And significantly different from those fed soaked Pigeon peas seed meal 50% and 75% diets. fish fed diets containing soaked 25% conferred better growth and feed utilization (feed intake) than those fed diets the control diet. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1840132748" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Based on the results obtained from replacement of fish meal, by processing of Pigeon peas in cold water (1:3w/v) for 24 hours under room temperature has significant influence on the nutritive value of Pigeon peas. However slight reduction in dry matter, crude lipid and ash content has occurred. The results of this study show that processed Pigeon peas seed can be included in Nile tilapia diets at 25% level without harmful effect in terms of growth performance and feed utilization of Nile tilapia fingerlings. It is     therefore concluded that whenever the cost of Pigeon peas is than fish meal, fish farmers can use soaked     Pigeon peas to replace up to 25% fish meal in Nile tilapia diets as a way of reducing the current demand pressure on fish meal.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1841660004">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Afuang</surname>
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Siddhuraju</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Becker</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Comparative nutritional evaluation of raw, methanol extracted residues and methanol extracts of moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) leaves on growth performance and feed utilization in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticusL.)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture Research</source>
          <volume>34</volume>
          <fpage>1147</fpage>
          <lpage>1159</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841660940">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>AIFA</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Inventory of feed producers in Nigeria. Published by Aquaculture and Inland Fisheries project. Annex II of the National special program for food security with the agriculture development program in all status and FCT</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          <publisher-loc>Abuja, Nigeria</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841668292">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Akingbade</surname>
            <given-names>A A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Sodeind</surname>
            <given-names>F G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Olaniyi</surname>
            <given-names>C O</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Oyetayo</surname>
            <given-names>T S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Fadare</surname>
            <given-names>O R</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Proximate and Mineral Elements Composition of Water Soaked Carnavalia ensiformis Seeds</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <source>Pakistan Journal of Nutrition</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>1401</fpage>
          <lpage>1403</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841767268">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Amaefule</surname>
            <given-names>K U</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Iheukwumere</surname>
            <given-names>F C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Nwaokoro</surname>
            <given-names>C C</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>A note on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of rabbits fed graded dietary levels of boiled Pigeon peas seed (Cajanus cajan L). Livestock Research for Rural Development</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2005</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841519796">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal"><name><surname>AOAC</surname><given-names/></name><article-title>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</article-title><date><year>1980</year></date>
13thEd.Washington. D.C



</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841518644">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Becker</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>HPS</surname>
            <given-names>Makkar</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effects of dietary tannic acid and quebracho tannin on growth performance and metabolic rates of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1999</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>175</volume>
          <fpage>327</fpage>
          <lpage>335</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841505788">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Bureau</surname>
            <given-names>D P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Harris</surname>
            <given-names>A M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Cho</surname>
            <given-names>C Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>The effects of purified alcohol extracts from soy products on feed intake and growth of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>161</volume>
          <fpage>27</fpage>
          <lpage>43</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841503196">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Dongmeza</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Siddhuraju</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Francis</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Becker</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effects of dehydrated methanol extracts of moringa ( Moringa oleifera Lam.) leaves and three of its fractions on growth performance and feed nutrient assimilation in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus (L.))</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>261</volume>
          <fpage>407</fpage>
          <lpage>422</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841508812">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal"><name><surname>El-sayed</surname><given-names>A F M</given-names></name><date><year>2006</year></date>
Tilapia culture, CABI publishing



</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841492468">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>AFM</surname>
            <given-names>El–Sayed</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Alternative dietary protein source for farmed tilapia, Oreochromis spps</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1999</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>179</volume>
          <fpage>149</fpage>
          <lpage>168</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841495204">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>AFM</surname>
            <given-names>El–Sayed</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effect of fermentation method on the nutritive of water hyacinth for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus (L)) Fingerlings</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>214</volume>
          <fpage>471</fpage>
          <lpage>478</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841494556">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>AFM</surname>
            <given-names>El–Sayed</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>AGJ</surname>
            <given-names>Tacon</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Fish meal replacers for tilapia: a review. Cahiers o ptions</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1997</year>
          </date>
          <source>Mediterranean's</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          <fpage>205</fpage>
          <lpage>224</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841470572">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>FAO</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>FAO1993 yearbook. Fishery statistics (commodities)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1995</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>77</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841467188">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>FAO</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Review of the state of world aquaculture</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1997</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>FAO Fisheries circular. No. 886, Rev.1.FAO</chapter-title>
          <fpage>163</fpage>
          <publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841464308">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>FAO</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Food and Agriculture Organization. The state world fisheries and aquaculture</article-title>
          <publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841461284">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>FAO</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>the State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2012</year>
          </date>
          <publisher-loc>Rome, Italy</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841459700">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Fathia</surname><given-names>I K</given-names></name><article-title>Performance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed fish meal and poultry by-product</article-title><date><year>2010</year></date>
MS.c. Thesis
<institution>University of Sudan of Science and Technology</institution></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841455956">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Gibtan</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Getahun</surname>
            <given-names>A an Mengistou</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effect of stocking density on the growth performance and yield of Nile tilapia [Oreochromis niloticus (L.,1758)] in a cage culture system in Lake Kuriftu</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <source>Ethiopia. Aquacul. Res</source>
          <volume>39</volume>
          <fpage>1450</fpage>
          <lpage>1460</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841440564">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Halver</surname>
            <given-names>J E</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>The vitamins and Minerals.In: Halver JE, Hardy RW (eds) Fish nutrition,3rd edn</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>839</fpage>
          <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>San Diego</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841436964">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Hardy</surname>
            <given-names>R W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>AGJ</surname>
            <given-names>Tacon</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Fish meal historical uses, production trends and future outlook for supplies</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>311</fpage>
          <lpage>325</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841435740">
        <label>21.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Higgs</surname>
            <given-names>D A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Markert</surname>
            <given-names>J R</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Development of practical dry diets for Coho Salmon, Using poultry by product meal Feather meal, soybean meal and rape seed</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1979</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841433868">
        <label>22.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Jackson</surname>
            <given-names>A J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Capper</surname>
            <given-names>B S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Matty</surname>
            <given-names>A J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Evaluation of some plant proteins in complete diets foe the tilapia (Sarotherodom mossambicus)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1982</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          <lpage>109</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841444092">
        <label>23.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Jahan</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Watanabe</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Kiron</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Satoh</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Improved carp diets based on plant protein sources reduce environmental phosphorus loading</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <source>Fisheries Science</source>
          <volume>69</volume>
          <fpage>219</fpage>
          <lpage>225</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841427860">
        <label>24.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kadam</surname>
            <given-names>S S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Salunkhe</surname>
            <given-names>D K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Nutritional composition, processing, and utilization of horse gram and moth bean</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1985</year>
          </date>
          <source>Crit Rev Food Sci Nut</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>26</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841424332">
        <label>25.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kaushik</surname>
            <given-names>S J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Nutrient requirements, supply and utilization in the context of Carp cul ture</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1995</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture</source>
          <volume>129</volume>
          <fpage>225</fpage>
          <lpage>241</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841420876">
        <label>26.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>X</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bai</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Evaluation of optimum dietary protein-to- energy ratio in juvenile Olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <source>Aquaculture Research</source>
          <volume>35</volume>
          <fpage>250</fpage>
          <lpage>255</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841418932">
        <label>27.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Madalla</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Novel Feed Ingredients for Nile Tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus L.)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <institution>Institute of Aquaculture University of Stirling Scotland United Kingdom</institution>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841416988">
        <label>28.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Nwokolo</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Nutritional evaluation of Pigeon peas meal. Plants Food for Human Nutrition</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1987</year>
          </date>
          <volume>37</volume>
          <fpage>283</fpage>
          <lpage>290</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841405756">
        <label>29.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Ogunji</surname>
            <given-names>J O</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Alternative protein sources in diets for farmed tilapia. Animal Science, Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <volume>74</volume>
          <issue>8</issue>
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          <lpage>32</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841404748">
        <label>30.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Ravindran</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ravindran</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Nutritional and anti-nutritional characteristics of Mucuna seeds</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1988</year>
          </date>
          <source>J Sci of Food Agric</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          <fpage>71</fpage>
          <lpage>79</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841400716">
        <label>31.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Sopade</surname>
            <given-names>P A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ajisegiri</surname>
            <given-names>E S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Badau</surname>
            <given-names>M H</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Use of Peleg's equation to model water absorption in some cereal grains during soaking</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1999</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Food Engineering</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          <fpage>269</fpage>
          <lpage>283</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841397908">
        <label>32.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>UNPD</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>World Population Projections, the</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <publisher-loc>Revision. NY, New York</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841398052">
        <label>33.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Valverde</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Vidal-Valverde</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Frías</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Changes in the carbohydrate composition of legumes after Soaking and cooking</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1993</year>
          </date>
          <source>J Am Diet Assoc</source>
          <volume>93</volume>
          <fpage>547</fpage>
          <lpage>550</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841393012">
        <label>34.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            <given-names>Y-J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Tian</surname>
            <given-names>L-X</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Du</surname>
            <given-names>Z-Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>J-T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Xiao W.P.,2005. Effects of dietary carbohydrate level on growth and body composition of juvenile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus×O. aureus</article-title>
          <source>Aquaculture Research</source>
          <volume>36</volume>
          <fpage>1408</fpage>
          <lpage>1413</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841376196">
        <label>35.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Xie</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
            <given-names>X</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Cui</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Utilization of several plant proteins by gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2001</year>
          </date>
          <source>J. Appl. Ichthyol</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          <fpage>70</fpage>
          <lpage>76</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1841374612">
        <label>36.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Yousif</surname>
            <given-names>O M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Wet salted fresh water fish (Fassiekh) Production in the Sudan. Paper presented at the 4th–FAO expert consultation on fish technology in Africa. Abidjan Ivory coast</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1988</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
