<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Agronomy Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2639-3166</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAR-23-4682</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2639-3166.jar-23-4682</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Evaluation Of Physicochemical Separation Characteristics of Pig Manure According to the Type of Solid-Liquid Separator Processes </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Sooryang</surname>
            <given-names>Kim</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842759076">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842851468">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Seunghyun</surname>
            <given-names>Park</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842848084">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Suchan</surname>
            <given-names>Lee</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842848084">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Jiwon</surname>
            <given-names>Jung</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842848084">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Sanghyean</surname>
            <given-names>Ahn</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842848084">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kwonwoong</surname>
            <given-names>Ham</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842848084">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Myunggyu</surname>
            <given-names>Lee</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842850244">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1842759076">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Sangji University, Republic of Korea  </addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842848084">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Environmental Engineering, Sangji University, Republic of Korea </addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842850244">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Smart life science, Sangji University, Republic of Korea</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842851468">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>Corresponding author</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>
    
    Sooryang Kim<addr-line>,</addr-line><addr-line> Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation</addr-line><addr-line>,</addr-line><addr-line> Sangji University</addr-line><addr-line>,</addr-line><addr-line> Republic of Korea</addr-line>, <email>sooryang@daum.net</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1842611780">
          <p>The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. </p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-08-15">
        <day>15</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>42</fpage>
      <lpage>53</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>8</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>15</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>©</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Soo-Ryang KIM</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org/jar/article/2025">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org/jar/article/2025</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <sec id="idm1842604060">
          <title>Objectives</title>
          <p>The solid-liquid separation (SLS) process generally separates solid and liquid   fractions in  wastewater  and  livestock  manure. The solid-liquid  separation      process  is  an  essential pretreatment step for the recycling and purification of pig manure. This study has assessed the separation and/or reduction efficiency by    various SLS processes used in pig farms.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1842604924">
          <title>Methods</title>
          <p>Seven types of SLS processes (centrifuge, centrifuge (+coagulation agent), belt press (+ coagulation agent), drum screen, inclined screen, vibration screen, and screw press) were used on 11 pig farms and conducted a comparative analysis. As for the sample in this study, the pig raw manure before treatment, the separated liquid and solid manure after treatment of the SLS process collected, respectively. These samples were provided for pH, EC(electrical conductivity) moisture content, COD<sub>Mn</sub>, BOD<sub>5</sub>, TN, TP, K, TS, SS, NaCl, and heavy metals analysis.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1842603340">
          <title>Results  and  Discussion</title>
          <p>The belt press (+coagulation agent) process had the highest TS and SS reduction rate of 78.8% and 96.9%, respectively. The highest removal efficiency of TN and TP was41.0% and 94.2% by belt press (+coagulation agent) and centrifuge (+coagulation agent),respectively. The belt press (+coagulation agent) removed 59.4% and 66.0% of BOD<sub>5</sub> and COD<sub>Mn</sub>,respectively. The Zn and Cu were                   removed 100% and 98.6% by centrifuge (+coagulation agent).However, the drum screen, inclined screen, vibration screen, screw press, and centrifuge showed lower removal efficiency of nutrient contents, solids, Zn, and Cu than centrifugal and belt press processes with chemical coagulation.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1842602980">
          <title>Conclusions</title>
          <p>The centrifugal and belt press separation processes that used chemical coagulation showed much more removal efficiency of nutrient contents, solids, and metals like Zn and Cu. Although SLS with chemical coagulants is an effective pre-treatment process for liquid manure treatment and helps removal effect for suspended solids, nutrients, and heavy metals, further studies are needed on how it affects biological or chemical processing processes that are linked.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>livestock</kwd>
        <kwd>pig manure</kwd>
        <kwd>solid–liquid separations</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="3"/>
        <table-count count="2"/>
        <page-count count="12"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1842602908" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>For a long time, livestock manure has been acknowledged as a valuable nutrient resource for plants and crops. However, livestock manure only contributes positively and replaces mineral and chemical          fertilizers when it is used properly with a minimal loss of nutrients like nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842508140">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842511812">2</xref>). The P and K in livestock manure are similar to those in commercial fertilizers, but the N content is much lower than that in commercial fertilizers<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842520676">3</xref>). Excessive application of livestock    manure as fertilizer and untreated and/or poorly treated manure causes nutrient leaching and runoff and ultimately pollutes  surface  and  groundwater,  salinizes  semi-arid  regions,  results  in  toxic                    concentrations of heavy metals, and decreases soil aeration<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842581724">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842371372">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842369284">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842366404">7</xref>). Before utilizing the manure as                    fertilizer, it should be treated properly to ensure its environmental safety with high fertilizer values. However, recovering the energy and nutrients from liquid manure is difficult because of its lower              concentration of organic matter and nutrients<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842357052">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842355180">9</xref>). Therefore, liquid manure separations become a key process in nutrient recovery strategies<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842352372">10</xref>).Pig manure is a combination of pig urine, feces, and water                    spillage, as well as remains of undigested food, antimicrobial drug residues, and pathogenic                        microorganisms<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842345436">11</xref>). It is commonly characterized by a high content of suspended solids, organic matter, phosphorus, and nitrogen<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842324764">16</xref>), which make it high in density and viscosity. Unlike cow and chicken             manure, pig manure is more than 90% liquid, so it has limited options for treatment by composting.             Solid–liquid separation (SLS) is part of organic and inorganic solids removal processes from manure slurry and most commonly separates manure into two streams known as the liquid and solid fractions. The SLS process accelerates the manure treatment practice and reduces the environmental impacts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842344428">12</xref>). According to Hjorth et al. (2010)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842520676">3</xref>), the efficiency of an SLS system depends on (1) the chemical and physical properties of the slurry, (2) the desired end-products, and (3) the potential separation                    techniques, including pre-and post-treatments and combinations of different techniques. Typically, the separation efficiencies of mechanical SLS processes are between 34% and 68% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842331100">13</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842330452">14</xref>). Because of the operational and environmental benefits, the SLS system is often accompanied by multi- step advanced manure treatment processes to improve subsequent treatment steps and achieve the environmental           standards and nutrient recovery targets for livestock manure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842345436">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842328004">15</xref>). For pig manure, SLS is a                       pre-treatment option that helps to separate N-rich liquid from P-rich solids and that allows the separated liquid to be used as a source of N to crops without over-supplying P<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842338732">17</xref>). Consequently, SLS in the            manure pre-treatment process creates high processing efficiency by mobilizing biological processes due to the particulate solids. The high concentration of pig manure in the slurry state can reduce the         processing load when solids are effectively removed (separated) by the SLS process. The SLS processes are mainly mechanical pre-treatment processes, but not all of them were designed to perform in the same fashion. The most common mechanical SLS systems are screen  separators  (inclined  screen,  vibrating  screen,  rotating  screen),  centrifuges (vertical and horizontal centrifuges), and presses (roller presses, belt presses, and screw presses). Landfilling and ocean dumping of livestock manure and food waste have been prohibited in South Korea since 2005 and 2012, respectively<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842335204">18</xref>). Therefore, several manure treatment technologies have been adopted in farm and public levels and they often consist of several treatment processes (SLS, composting, aeration, anaerobic digestion, liquid fertilization, and purification discharge) coupled with each other. This study evaluated the separation efficiency of BOD, COD,      nutrients (N, P, and K), and heavy metals (Cu and Zn) of various solid-liquid separators used in pig farms.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842576148" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Materials and Methods </title>
      <sec id="idm1842574852">
        <title>Sampling Methods for Solid-Liquid Separation (SLS) </title>
        <p>The sampling of the influent, effluent, and solid materials of the solid-liquid separation (SLS) was      conducted after pre-operation of each device for 5 to 30 minutes, in accordance with the characteristics of the respective equipment. The sampling method adhered to specific regulations and guidelines      regarding the turbidity sampling criteria and testing methods for the liquid fraction. For the sampling of the influent, effluent, and solid materials of the SLS, sampling was performed after a pre-operation    period ranging from 5 to 30 minutes, depending on the characteristics of each device. In the case of    liquid samples, such as the influent and effluent, a T-valve was installed at the inlet and outlet points to facilitate sample collection upon request (Please note that in pig farms where the installation of a T-valve was physically impractical, sampling was conducted directly from the inlet and outlet pipes). The liquid samples were collected by the operator after an arbitrary time determined based on on-site conditions. The influent and effluent samples were collected at the midpoint of the predetermined time interval.  Regarding the collection of solid samples, the sampler designated an arbitrary time frame (ranging from 1 to 30 minutes) and employed an appropriate container to collect the entire discharge from the solid outlet of the SLS. The weight of the collected sample was measured on-site, followed by the extraction of a portion of the solid sample from the collection container.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1842575212">
        <title>Solid-liquid separation techniques</title>
        <p>The samples were collected from 11 pig farms that used seven different kinds of SLS processes. <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841811548">Table 1</xref> shows the sampling site, pig population (head) and the technologies they used while this study was being conducted. The average livestock population was 3,233 heads in surveyed farms and the finishing pig slurry was used for this study. Six out of 12 farms in this study paired screw press with other SLS      processes and three farms used coagulation agents. The samples were collected after 5 to 30 minutes of pre-operation based on the characteristics of each solid-liquid separator from individual pig farms. The separated solids were sampled from the solid containers after 30 minutes of solid-liquid separator      operation, and then collected solids were mixed uniformly and weighed on site. The influents and      separated liquids were collected by installing T-shaped valves on the inlet and outlet. On farms where installing valves was not possible, the influents and treated liquid were collected from the inlet and    discharge pipes. The influents and separated liquids were collected when the treated solids were past their half-time. The chemical analysis of the influents, separated liquids, and separated solids consisted of pH, EC, TN, TP, K, TS, SS, NaCl, and heavy metals. The COD<sub>Mn</sub>, BOD<sub>5</sub>, were analyzed for influent and separated liquid, and the moisture content was only analyzed for separated solids. These analyses were conducted according to the standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. The pH and EC were measured by YSI meter (multilab IDS 4010-2, xylem Inc. US). The heavy metal content (Cu, and Zn) was measured using Spectroblue IPS.OES (FMX36, Germany) based on the US EPA   method 7476.</p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1841811548">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> The list of sampling sites and their solid–liquid separation (SLS) techniques </title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td> Sampling site</td>
                <td>Pig (head)</td>
                <td>Solid-liquid separation (SLS)</td>
                <td> Abbreviations</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pig farm A (Nonsan) Pig farm B (Yeoju)</td>
                <td>2,000 2,200</td>
                <td>Drum screen (+ScrewPress)</td>
                <td> D/S</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pig farm C (Gongju) Pig farm D (Jincheon) Pig farm E (Yeongcheon)</td>
                <td>1,000 6,000 10,000</td>
                <td> Inclined screen (+Screw Press)</td>
                <td>  I/S</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td> Pig farm F (Icheon)</td>
                <td> 1,600</td>
                <td>Vibration screen (+ScrewPress)</td>
                <td> V/S</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pig farm G (Gumi) Pig farm H (Boeun)</td>
                <td>3,000 1,000</td>
                <td> Screw Press</td>
                <td> S/P</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pig farm I (Hapcheon) Pig farm J (Yeongju)</td>
                <td>2,000 3,800</td>
                <td> Centrifuge</td>
                <td> Cf</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pig farm I (Hapcheon) Pig farm J (Yeongju)</td>
                <td>2,000 3,800</td>
                <td>Centrifuge (+coagulationagent)</td>
                <td> Cf (+Cog)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td> Pig farm K (Changwon)</td>
                <td> 4,200</td>
                <td>Belt Press (+coagulationagent)</td>
                <td> B/P (+Cog)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The removal efficiency was calculated using the formula below.</p>
        <fig id="idm1841753612">
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image1.png" mime-subtype="png"/>
        </fig>
        <p>Where, η : removal rate (%) </p>
        <p>A. A : Concentration before treatment </p>
        <p>B. B : Concentration after treatment </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842548052" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results and Discussion </title>
      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841753180">Table 2</xref> shows the changes in physicochemical and nutrient parameters by different SLS  processes</p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1841753180">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Changes of physicochemical and nutrient parameters (mean value) by different SLS processes (n=3).</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td> Items</td>
              <td> Units</td>
              <td> stages</td>
              <td> +V/S</td>
              <td> +D/S</td>
              <td> +I/S</td>
              <td> +S/P</td>
              <td> +Cf</td>
              <td>+Cf(+Cog)</td>
              <td>+B/P(+Cog)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2"> pH</td>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>6.90</td>
              <td>7.08</td>
              <td>7.20</td>
              <td>7.00</td>
              <td>7.28</td>
              <td>7.40</td>
              <td>7.15</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2"/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>6.65</td>
              <td>7.23</td>
              <td>7.23</td>
              <td>6.88</td>
              <td>7.25</td>
              <td>7.53</td>
              <td>7.20</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2"> EC     (mS/cm)    </td>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>50.10</td>
              <td>34.88</td>
              <td>22.77</td>
              <td>44.63</td>
              <td>28.08</td>
              <td>29.85</td>
              <td>32.65</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2"/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>42.60</td>
              <td>33.70</td>
              <td>21.13</td>
              <td>41.05</td>
              <td>27.65</td>
              <td>17.75</td>
              <td>31.90</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2"/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(15.0)</td>
              <td>(3.4)</td>
              <td>(7.2)</td>
              <td>(8.0)</td>
              <td>(1.5)</td>
              <td>(40.5)</td>
              <td>(2.3)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  NaCl</td>
              <td>    (%)</td>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>1.38</td>
              <td>0.68</td>
              <td>0.63</td>
              <td>2.43</td>
              <td>0.72</td>
              <td>0.75</td>
              <td>0.80</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>1.42</td>
              <td>0.67</td>
              <td>0.43</td>
              <td>2.32</td>
              <td>0.69</td>
              <td>0.19</td>
              <td>0.22</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(-2.3)</td>
              <td>(0.5)</td>
              <td>(32.0)</td>
              <td>(4.7)</td>
              <td>(4.9)</td>
              <td>(74.6)</td>
              <td>(72.9)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  TS</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>15.82</td>
              <td>5.53</td>
              <td>3.47</td>
              <td>12.55</td>
              <td>4.19</td>
              <td>4.68</td>
              <td>8.24</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>12.17</td>
              <td>4.82</td>
              <td>2.78</td>
              <td>10.74</td>
              <td>3.39</td>
              <td>1.50</td>
              <td>1.75</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(23.0)</td>
              <td>(12.8)</td>
              <td>(19.9)</td>
              <td>(14.5)</td>
              <td>(19.0)</td>
              <td>(67.9)</td>
              <td>78.8)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  SS</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>10.42</td>
              <td>3.99</td>
              <td>2.30</td>
              <td>9.42</td>
              <td>2.74</td>
              <td>3.21</td>
              <td>6.43</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>7.92</td>
              <td>3.44</td>
              <td>1.98</td>
              <td>8.66</td>
              <td>1.86</td>
              <td>1.11</td>
              <td>0.20</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(24.1)</td>
              <td>(13.6)</td>
              <td>(14.0)</td>
              <td>(8.1)</td>
              <td>(32.2)</td>
              <td>(65.5)</td>
              <td>(96.9)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  TN</td>
              <td> (mg/L)</td>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>14,933</td>
              <td>7,088</td>
              <td>3,704</td>
              <td>10,787</td>
              <td>5,015</td>
              <td>5,197</td>
              <td>7,852</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>12,973</td>
              <td>6,648</td>
              <td>3,319</td>
              <td>10,471</td>
              <td>4,781</td>
              <td>3,304</td>
              <td>4,631</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(13.1)</td>
              <td>(6.2)</td>
              <td>(10.4)</td>
              <td>(2.9)</td>
              <td>(4.7)</td>
              <td>(36.4)</td>
              <td>(41.0)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  TP</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>4,277</td>
              <td>1,022</td>
              <td>793</td>
              <td>3,285</td>
              <td>650</td>
              <td>785</td>
              <td>1,603</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>3,874</td>
              <td>940</td>
              <td>573</td>
              <td>2,919</td>
              <td>457</td>
              <td>46</td>
              <td>137</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(9.4)</td>
              <td>(8.0)</td>
              <td>(27.7)</td>
              <td>(11.2)</td>
              <td>(29.8)</td>
              <td>(94.2)</td>
              <td>(91.5)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  K</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>7,768</td>
              <td>3,159</td>
              <td>2,487</td>
              <td>6,360</td>
              <td>2,961</td>
              <td>2,873</td>
              <td>3,722</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>7,953</td>
              <td>3,162</td>
              <td>2,400</td>
              <td>6,335</td>
              <td>2,885</td>
              <td>2,139</td>
              <td>1511</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(-2.4)</td>
              <td>(-0.1)</td>
              <td>(3.5)</td>
              <td>(0.4)</td>
              <td>(2.6)</td>
              <td>(25.6)</td>
              <td>(59.4)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  BOD5</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>85,350</td>
              <td>30,290</td>
              <td>10,229</td>
              <td>60,585</td>
              <td>21,948</td>
              <td>22,825</td>
              <td>29,580</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>72,850</td>
              <td>27,940</td>
              <td>8,894</td>
              <td>58,250</td>
              <td>20,915</td>
              <td>10,525</td>
              <td>10,050</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(14.6)</td>
              <td>(7.8)</td>
              <td>(13.0)</td>
              <td>(3.9)</td>
              <td>(4.7)</td>
              <td>(53.9)</td>
              <td>(66.0)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  COD<sub>Mn</sub></td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>40,527</td>
              <td>14,923</td>
              <td>7,822</td>
              <td>3,0171</td>
              <td>11,491</td>
              <td>13,287</td>
              <td>18,263</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>34,884</td>
              <td>14,139</td>
              <td>6,977</td>
              <td>2,6291</td>
              <td>8,295</td>
              <td>3,245</td>
              <td>4,104</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(13.9)</td>
              <td>(5.3)</td>
              <td>(10.8)</td>
              <td>(12.9)</td>
              <td>(27.8)</td>
              <td>(75.6)</td>
              <td>(77.5)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  Zn</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>110.4</td>
              <td>55.0</td>
              <td>33.4</td>
              <td>105.0</td>
              <td>65.6</td>
              <td>65.6</td>
              <td>738.0</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>104.6</td>
              <td>50.7</td>
              <td>28.0</td>
              <td>109.8</td>
              <td>57.5</td>
              <td>ND*</td>
              <td>6.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(5.2)</td>
              <td>(7.8)</td>
              <td>(16.0)</td>
              <td>(-4.6)</td>
              <td>(12.4)</td>
              <td>(100.0)</td>
              <td>(99.1)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>  Cu</td>
              <td/>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>66.2</td>
              <td>19.5</td>
              <td>16.6</td>
              <td>56.7</td>
              <td>24.3</td>
              <td>24.0</td>
              <td>47.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated liquid</td>
              <td>65.9</td>
              <td>16.8</td>
              <td>11.0</td>
              <td>57.3</td>
              <td>22.1</td>
              <td>0.3</td>
              <td>0.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>(Reduction, %)</td>
              <td>(0.4)</td>
              <td>(13.8)</td>
              <td>(33.7)</td>
              <td>(-1.1)</td>
              <td>(9.1)</td>
              <td>(98.6)</td>
              <td>(98.1)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td> <sup>+</sup>MC</td>
              <td> (%)</td>
              <td>Influents</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td>Separated solid</td>
              <td>73.2</td>
              <td>68.6</td>
              <td>74.7</td>
              <td>65.7</td>
              <td>47.4</td>
              <td>74.0</td>
              <td>76.4</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1842403788">
            <label/>
            <p>+MC, moisture contents; *ND, not detected; +V/S,  Vibration screen (+Screw Press); +D/S, Drum screen (+Screw Press); +I/S,   Inclined screen (+Screw Press); +S/P, Screw Press; +Cf, Centrifuge; +Cf (+Cog), Centrifuge (+coagulation agent); +B/P(+Cog), Belt Press (+coagulation agent)</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <sec id="idm1842403428">
        <title>Changes in EC and NaCl content </title>
        <p>The different screen mesh sizes from different SLS methods create differences between operation and removal efficiencies of SLS systems and manure characteristics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842334916">19</xref>). The pH and EC are two important manure characteristics, especially when manure is used for liquid or compost fertilizer. The changes of pH and EC by SLS processes show similarities with the  finding of Jørgensen and Jensen (2009) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842334916">19</xref>), where separated liquids from the influents showed stable pH changes but variable EC changes. Our    values show that the pH units remained at 6.61–8.63, which were near neutral, for 44 samples, while EC varied from 2.57 to 4.47 mS/cm. They also show that the Centrifuge (+coagulation agent) had the      highest reduction of EC. The near-neutral pH (6.7 to 7.2 units) and widely varied EC (4.9–17.0 mS/cm) are also reflected in studies by Kumaragamage et al. (2016) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842306516">21</xref>) and Vanotti et al. (2018)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842330452">14</xref>). However, the samples that used coagulation agents showed a little increment in pH that because of the chemical            compositions of the coagulant agents but stayed near neutral <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842345436">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842344428">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842309540">20</xref>). In this study, the pH range of                  influents and separated liquids did not change much by any of the SLS processes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841753180">Table 2</xref>). The pH changed from 6.90 162 to 6.65, 7.08 to 7.23, 7.20 to 7.23, 7.00 to 6.88, 7.28 to 7.25, 7.40 to 7.53, and 7.15 to 7.20 units for the V/S, D/S, I/S, S/P, Cf, Cf (+Cog), and B/P (+Cog) processes, respectively. The electrical conductivity (EC) reduction by Cf (+Cog) of 40.5% was the highest when the influent EC was 29.8 mS/cm and the separated liquid contained 17.8 mS/cm EC. For the V/S, the influents had the     highest EC value, 50.1 mS/cm, but it was reduced 15.0% to 42.6 mS/cm after the treatment. The lowest EC removal was observed for the Cf, where EC reduction was only 1.5%, from 28.1 mS/cm to 27.7 mS/cm. On the contrary, B/P (+Cog) with a coagulant agent did not show much EC reduction (2.3%). The NaCl reduction by Cf (+Cog) and B/P (+Cog) with a coagulation agent showed the highest removal   efficiency at 74.6% and 72.9%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841753180">Table 2</xref>). Among the three screening separator processes, the V/S added up to 2.3% NaCl, I/S reduced 32.0%, and D/S reduced 173 only 0.5%. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1842402708">
        <title>Changes of TS and SS contents</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1841523596">Figure 1</xref> shows the changes in TS and SS by different SLS processes. The B/P (+Cog) and the Cf (+Cog) had 78.76% and 67.94% TS removal efficiency, respectively, the highest. Excepting these two            coagulations agents–supported SLS processes, the rest of the SLS processes showed 12.8~23.0% TS removal efficiency. The coagulant-supported SLS processes had the highest SS reduction: 96.9% and 67.94% by B/P (+Cog) and Cf (+Cog), respectively. The Cf process had SS removal efficiency of 32.2%. The rest of SLS processes showed 8.1~24.1% TS removal efficiency. Meanwhile, the moisture in the separated solids was 73.2%, 68.6%, 74.7%, 65.7%, 74.0%, and 76.4% for the V/S, D/S, I/S, S/P, Cf (+Cog), and B/P (+Cog) processes, respectively. However, the Cf process contained the lowest moisture content at 47.41%.</p>
        <fig id="idm1841523596">
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Changes in TS (A) and SS (B) by different SLS processes</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image2.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1842399036">
        <title>Changes in nutrient content (TN, TP, and K), BOD<sub>5</sub>, and COD<sub>Mn</sub></title>
        <p>Comparing the screw press (S/P) with a centrifuge (Cf), several authors found that the centrifuge achieves higher performance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842357052">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842352372">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842305796">22</xref>). According to Aguirre-Villegas et al (2019) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842330452">14</xref>), Cf processes are more effective for the removal of TS, SS, TN, TP, K, BOD<sub>5</sub>, and COD<sub>Mn</sub> than S/P processes. This     finding is also reflected in this study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1841811548">Table 1</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1841463020">Figure 2</xref> shows the changes in nutrient content (TN, TP, and K), BOD<sub>5</sub>, and COD<sub>Mn</sub> by different SLS processes. When comparing Cf process with V/S, D/S, V/S shows better removal of TS, TN, and BOD<sub>5</sub>. The Cf (+Cog) process had a better EC, NaCl, TS, and TP removal 9 efficiency than the B/P process. On the other side, the B/P (+Cog) process had a                               comparatively better performance for TN, K, BOD<sub>5</sub>, and COD<sub>Mn</sub> removal than the Cf (+Cog) process. The relatively low removal efficiency of TN, TP, and K in separated liquids by mechanical processes without coagulation agents could be because of their higher suable or dissolved form <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842344428">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842330452">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842318036">23</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842316380">24</xref>).                       The higher TP concentrations in separated liquids and the removal efficiency for B/P (+Cog) are similar to those in a study conducted by Møller et al. (2002) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842313860">25</xref>). However, the higher removal efficiency of TN, TP, and TK by Cf (+Cog) and B/P (+Cog) is due to the chemical treatment coupled with mechanical (centrifuge and belt press) treatment, which screened out smaller sized particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842309540">20</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842291916">26</xref>). The B/P (+Cog) showed the highest TN reduction of 41.0%, where the influents had 7,857 mg/l, and the separated liquid had 4,631 mg/l of TN. The Cf (+Cog) had the second highest TN removal of 36.4%, where the TN               reduced from 5,197mg/l to 3,304mg/l. However, V/S, D/S, I/S, S/P, and Cf showed 2.9~13.1% TN      removal efficiency. The removal of TP had similar results as that of TN. The Cf (+Cog) and B/P (+Cog) processes showed 94.2% and 91.5% of TP removal efficiency, respectively, in separated liquids.       However, V/S, D/S, I/S, S/P, and Cf showed 8.0~29.8% TN removal efficiency. The B/P (+Cog) and Cf (+Cog) showed 59.4% and 25.6% K removal efficiency, respectively. The I/S, S/P, and Cf had only 0.4~3.5% removal efficiency for K. Moreover, in the case of V/S and D/S, the concentration of K     somewhat increased somewhat in separated liquids. The B/P (+Cog) and Cf (+Cog) showed 59.4% and 25.6% K removal efficiency, respectively. The I/S, S/P, and Cf had only 0.4~3.5% removal efficiency for K. Moreover, in the case of V/S and D/S, the concentration of K somewhat increased in separated liquids. The concentration of COD<sub>Mn</sub> and BOD<sub>5</sub> indicates the presence of oxygen-demanding                         substances in wastewater and are often used as pollution indicators. In this study, the chemical coagulant agent–supported centrifugal and belt press SLS were able to remove the highest amount of BOD<sub>5</sub> and COD<sub>Mn</sub>. The B/P (+Cog) reduced 66.0% of BOD<sub>5</sub>, and the Cf (+Cog) reduced 53.9% of it, and the   concentration of BOD<sub>5</sub> in influents was 29,580 mg/l and 22,825 mg/l, and after treatment in separated liquid that reduced to 10,050 mg/l and 10,525 mg/l, respectively. The removal of COD<sub>Mn</sub> had similar results as that of BOD<sub>5</sub>, comparatively. The Cf (+Cog) and B/P (+Cog) processes showed 75.6% and 77.5% of COD<sub>Mn</sub> removal efficiency, respectively, in separated liquids. However, other SLS processes showed low removal efficiency for BOD<sub>5</sub> (4.7~14.6%) and COD<sub>Mn</sub> (5.3~27.8%). About 40% of BOD<sub>5</sub> was found in a solid fraction of manure; therefore, after performing SLS, about 60% of the BOD<sub>5</sub> was supposed to remain in the separated liquid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842289108">27</xref>). Therefore, the TS and BOD<sub>5</sub> 10 concentration in separated liquids   remained in the same sequential order of V/S, S/P, D/S, Cf, I/S. For the coagulation agent–assisted SLS processes, the respective TS and BOD<sub>5</sub> removal was 67.9% and 53.9% for Cf (+Cog) and 78.8% and 66.0% for B/P (+Cog). Similar properties were noticed in changes in COD<sub>Mn</sub>. Each sample that                      contained higher TS concentrations in both the influent and separated liquids showed higher COD<sub>Mn</sub>        concentrations as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842286228">28</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="idm1841463020">
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Changes in TN (A), TP (B), K (C), BOD5, and CODMn (D) by different SLS 245 processes</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image3.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1842422796">
        <title>Changes in Zn and Cu </title>
        <p>Separating of heavy metals such as Zn and Cu from liquid manure before land application reduces the risk of soil contamination <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842330452">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842285076">29</xref>). Among all the analyzed heavy metal contents, Zn and Cu were found in a higher concentration in the influents. The probable cause is that the pigs get the Zn and Cu from their feeding operation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842298396">30</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1841460788">Figure 3</xref> shows the changes in nutrient content Zn and Cu by different SLS                   processes. The coagulant assist centrifuge (Cf (+Cog)) and belt press (B/P (+Cog)) were very effective at reducing the heavy metals such as Zn (100% and 98.6%) and Cu (99.1% and 98.1%). These findings are similar to those of Vanotti et al. (2018)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842345436">11</xref>),  which found that a PAM-based mechanical pressing SLS system could remove 88% of Zn and Cu. However, contrastingly, other SLS processes showed low removal efficiency for Cu and Zn. The V/S, D/S, I/S, and Cf showed 5.2~12.4% Zn removal efficiency and 0.4~33.7% Cu removal efficiency, respectively. Moreover, in the case of the I/P process, the              concentration of Zn and Cu somewhat increased in separated liquids. </p>
        <fig id="idm1841460788">
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Changes in Zn (A) and Cu (B) by different SLS processes</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image4.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842375868" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusions </title>
      <p>This study has assessed the separation and/or reduction efficiency of various SLS technologies used in pig farms. The centrifugal and belt press processes that used chemical coagulation showed much more removal of nutrient contents, solids, and metals like Zn and Cu. Among all the SLS processes studied, the Cf (+Cog) process showed a 40.5% EC reduction, the highest among all SLS processes. The NaCl was reduced by the Cf (+Cog) and B/P (+Cog) by 74.6% and 72.9%, respectively. The B/P (+Cog)     process had the highest TS and SS reduction at 78.8% and 96.9%, respectively. The highest TN and TP removals were 41.0% and 94.2% by B/P (+Cog) and Cf (+Cog), respectively. The B/P (+Cog) removed 59.4% and 66.0% of BOD<sub>5</sub> and COD<sub>Mn</sub>, respectively. The Zn and Cu were reduced by 100% and 98.6% by Cf (+Cog), respectively. However, V/S, D/S, I/S, S/P, and Cf showed lower removal efficiency of nutrient contents, solids, Zn, and Cu than centrifugal and belt press processes that used chemical                     coagulation. In this study, we found that chemical coagulants made a notable difference in SLS           performance for the removal of or changes to different physiochemical parameters of pig manure.       Although SLS is an effective pre-treatment process for liquid manure treatment and using chemical    coagulants helps remove excess fine solids, nutrients, and heavy metals, further studies are needed to determine how coagulants agents react with other SLS and liquid manure 12 treatment processes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842371476">
      <title>Authors and Contribution Statement </title>
      <p>Sooryang Kim </p>
      <p>Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation Sangji University Republic of Korea, Research                    Professor,ORPID(0000-0001-6449-5100), Data analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p>
      <p>Seunghyun Park </p>
      <p>Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea, M.D. Student, ORCID(0009-0000-8845-2295), Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p>
      <p>Suchan Lee </p>
      <p>Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea, M.D. Student, ORCID(0009-0007-6320-1407), Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing </p>
      <p>Jiwon Jung </p>
      <p>Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea, M.D. Student, ORCID(0000-0002-4474-1105), Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing </p>
      <p>Sanghyean Ahn </p>
      <p>Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea, M.D. Student, ORCID(0009-0001-7059-0312), Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing </p>
      <p>Kwonwoong Ham</p>
      <p> Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea, M.D. Student, ORCID(0009-0008-6730-5972), Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing </p>
      <p>Myunggyu Lee </p>
      <p>Department of Smart life science Sangji University Republic of Korea, Professor, 16 ORCID(0000-0002-8014-5490), Project administration, Supervision</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>This work was supported by by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) and the Korea Smart Farm R&amp;D Foundation (KosFarm) through the Smart Farm Innovation Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Rural Development Administration (RDA) (421046-03), and the Sangji University of Graduate School.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1842508140">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names>F Bouwman</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Booij</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Global use and trade of foodstuffs and consequences for the nitrogen cycle</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1998</year>
          </date>
          <source>Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys</source>
          <volume>52</volume>
          <fpage>261</fpage>
          <lpage>267</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842511812">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>H</surname>
            <given-names>C Le</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Biodigester effluent versus manure, from pigs or cattle, as fertilizer for duckweed (Lemna spp.)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1998</year>
          </date>
          <source>Livest. Res. Rural Dev</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>56</fpage>
          <lpage>65</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842520676">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Hjorth</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>V Christensen</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>L Christensen</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev</source>
          <volume>30</volume>
          <fpage>153</fpage>
          <lpage>180</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/agro/2009010</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842581724">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>H Burton</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Turner</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Manure Management: Treatment Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture, 2nd ed., Silsoe Research Institute, UK. 4</chapter-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842371372">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Steinfeld</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Gerber</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wassenaar</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Castel</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rosales</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>de-Haan</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <source>ISBN</source>
          <volume>978</volume>
          <fpage>92</fpage>
          <lpage>5</lpage>
          <publisher-loc>FAO, Rome</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842369284">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>P Bernal</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Roig</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Madrid</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names>F Navarro</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Salinity risks on calcareous soils following pig slurry applications</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1992</year>
          </date>
          <source>Soil UseManage</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          <lpage>130</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842366404">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>P Bernal</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Roig</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>García</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Nutrient balances in calcareous soils after application of different rates of pig slurry</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1993</year>
          </date>
          <source>Soil Use Manage</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          <lpage>14</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842357052">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>H</surname>
            <given-names>B Møller</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>J</surname>
            <given-names>D Hansen</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>A G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Sørensen</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <source>American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers</source>
          <volume>50</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>193</fpage>
          <lpage>200</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842355180">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>R Teira-Esmatges</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Flotats</surname>
            <given-names>X</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>A method for livestock waste management planning in NE Spain</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <source>Waste Management</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          <fpage>917</fpage>
          <lpage>932</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842352372">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>H</surname>
            <given-names>B Møller</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lund</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Solid-liquid separation of livestock slurry: 13 Efficiency and cost</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2000</year>
          </date>
          <source>Bioresource Tech</source>
          <volume>74</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>223</fpage>
          <lpage>229</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842345436">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>B Vanotti</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>S Ro</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>J</surname>
            <given-names>H Loughrin</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>P</surname>
            <given-names>D Millner</given-names>
          </name>
          <date>
            <year>2018</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>High-Rate Solid-Liquid Separation Coupled With Nitrogen and Phosphorus Treatment of Swine Manure: Effect on Water Quality. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</chapter-title>
          <volume>2</volume>
          <issue>49</issue>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2018.00049</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842344428">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>H</surname>
            <given-names>A Aguirre-Villegas</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>R</surname>
            <given-names>A Larson</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Sharara 2019 Anaerobic digestion, solid liquid separation, and drying of dairy manure: Measuring constituents and modeling emission</article-title>
          <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
          <volume>696</volume>
          <fpage>134059</fpage>
          <lpage>11</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842331100">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>J</surname>
            <given-names>P Chastain</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>B Vanotti</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effectiveness of liquid-solid separation for treatment of flushed dairy manure: a case study</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2001</year>
          </date>
          <source>Appl. Engr. Agric</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          <fpage>343</fpage>
          <lpage>354</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13031/2013.6210</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842330452">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Riaño</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>García-González 2014 On-farm treatment of swine manure based on solid-liquid separation and biological nitrification-denitrification of the liquid fraction</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Environmental Management</source>
          <volume>132</volume>
          <fpage>87</fpage>
          <lpage>93</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842328004">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>B Cantrell</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ducey</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>S Ro</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>P</surname>
            <given-names>G Hunt</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <source>Bioresource Technology</source>
          <volume>99</volume>
          <fpage>7941</fpage>
          <lpage>7953</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842324764">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Steinmetz</surname>
            <given-names>R L R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Kunz</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>V</surname>
            <given-names>L Dressler</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Flores</surname>
            <given-names>E M M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>F</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Martins</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <source>CLEAN: Soil, Air, Water</source>
          <volume>37</volume>
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          <lpage>244</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842338732">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kumaragamage</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>O</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Greiger</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Phosphorus fractions in solid and liquid separates of swine slurry separated using different technologies</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2013</year>
          </date>
          <source>J. Environ. Qual</source>
          <volume>42</volume>
          <fpage>1863</fpage>
          <lpage>1871</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2013.03.0074</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842335204">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Korean Ministry of Environment (KMOE)</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <source>KMOE, Waste-to-Energy Division, Sejong, South Korea</source>
          <volume>18</volume>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842334916">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kunz</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Steinmetz</surname>
            <given-names>R L R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Coldebella</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effect of storage time on swine manure solid separation efficiency by screening</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <source>Bioresource Technology</source>
          <volume>100</volume>
          <fpage>5485</fpage>
          <lpage>5489</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842309540">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Jørgensen</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>L</surname>
            <given-names>S Jensen</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Chemical and biochemical variation in animal manure solids separated using different commercial separation technologies</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <source>Bioresource Technology</source>
          <volume>100</volume>
          <fpage>3088</fpage>
          <lpage>3096</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842306516">
        <label>21.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kumaragamage</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>O</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>G</surname>
            <given-names>J Racz</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Comparison of Nutrient and Metal Loadings with the Application of Swine Manure Slurries and Their Liquid Separates to Soils</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <source>J. Environ. Qual</source>
          <volume>45</volume>
          <fpage>1769</fpage>
          <lpage>1775</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2016.04.0130</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842305796">
        <label>22.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>A Gooch</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>F Inglis</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Czymmek</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Mechanical solid-liquid manure separation: performance evaluation on four New York state dairy farms - a preliminary report</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2005</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Annual International Meeting. Paper Number: 05–4104. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers</chapter-title>
          <publisher-name>St. Joseph</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Michigan</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842318036">
        <label>23.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Bernet</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Béline</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <source>Bioresour. Technol</source>
          <volume>100</volume>
          <fpage>5431</fpage>
          <lpage>5436</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842316380">
        <label>24.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Saeys</surname>
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names>M Mouazen</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ramon</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Potential for onsite and online analysis of pig manure using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2005</year>
          </date>
          <source>Biosystems Eng</source>
          <volume>91</volume>
          <fpage>393</fpage>
          <lpage>402</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842313860">
        <label>25.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>H</surname>
            <given-names>B Møller</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Ahring</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <source>Bioresource Tech</source>
          <volume>85</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>189</fpage>
          <lpage>196</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842291916">
        <label>26.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>B Vanotti</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rashash</surname>
            <given-names>D M C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>P</surname>
            <given-names>G Hunt</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Liquid–solids separation of flushed swine manure with PAM: effect of wastewater strength</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <source>Trans. ASAE</source>
          <volume>45</volume>
          <fpage>26</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842289108">
        <label>27.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>P</surname>
            <given-names>M Ndegwa</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effect of solid–liquid separation on BOD and VFAs in swine manure</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2001</year>
          </date>
          <source>Environ. Technol</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <fpage>1237</fpage>
          <lpage>1243</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842286228">
        <label>28.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>J</surname>
            <given-names>P Chastain</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>B Vanotti</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Correlation Equations to Predict the Solids and Plant Nutrient Removal Efficiencies for Gravity Settling of Swine Manure. In:</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>R.T. Burnes (ed), Animal, Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes IX : Proceedings of the Nineth International Symposium, Research</chapter-title>
          <fpage>487</fpage>
          <lpage>495</lpage>
          <publisher-name>ASAE, St. Joseph, MI</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Triangle Park, NC</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842285076">
        <label>29.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Bolan</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Adriano</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Mahimairaja</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Distribution and bioavailability of trace elements in livestock and poultry manure by products</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <source>Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol</source>
          <volume>34</volume>
          <fpage>291</fpage>
          <lpage>338</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842298396">
        <label>30.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><article-title>Content of heavy metals in animal feeds and manures from farms of different scales in northeast</article-title><date><year>2012</year></date><source>Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing Jiwon Jung</source><chapter-title>Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing Sanghyean Ahn Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea, M.D. Student, ORCID(0009-0001-7059-0312), Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing Kwonwoong</chapter-title><volume>16</volume><fpage>0009</fpage><lpage>0000</lpage><publisher-name>M.D. Student</publisher-name><institution>Suchan Lee Department of Environmental Engineering Sangji University Republic of Korea</institution>
Project administration, Supervision


</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
