<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Agronomy Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2639-3166</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2639-3166.jar-21-3880</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAR-21-3880</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Response of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Growth, Yield and Yield     Components to Compost and Phosphorus Fertilizers</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Wael.</surname>
            <given-names>A. Marajan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842035148">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Baha</surname>
            <given-names>Eldin. M. Idris</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842035868">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Abubaker</surname>
            <given-names>Haroun Mohamed Adam</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842037020">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842128476">*</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1842035148">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Soil and Water Science, College of Agriculture, University of Bahri.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842035868">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Crop Science, College of Agriculture, University of Bahri.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842037020">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Crop Science, College of Agriculture, University of Bahri.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842128476">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>Corresponding author</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Prem</surname>
            <given-names>Narain</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1841868308">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1841868308">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>29278 Glen Oaks Blvd. W.                      Farmington Hills, MI 48334-2932 USA.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>
  Abubaker Haroun Mohamed Adam,Department of Crop Science, College of Agriculture, University of Bahri-Sudan. Cell (s) <phone>+2490912892429/0128947658</phone><email>abubakerharoun@gmail.com</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1849404700">
          <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2021-08-25">
        <day>25</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>14</fpage>
      <lpage>22</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Wael. A. Marajan, et al.</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org/jar/article/1696">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org/jar/article/1696</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Sugar beet is one of the sugar crops which widely grown in different regions of the world due to its advantages over Sugarcane. Several studies were conducted in Sudan to assess its adaptation and                   economic value. However, the aim of this experiment was to study the effect of application of compost and different levels of phosphorus fertilizer and their      combination on Sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic>) growth attributes, yield and yield components. The study was conducted during the winter season 2018 –2019 at the farm of the College of Agriculture, University of Bahri, Alkadaro-Khartoum State, Sudan. The experiment was arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications and six treatments, namely the Compost (5t./ha.), Phosphorous (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5)</sub> (88kg./ha.), P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (176 kg./ha.), Compost (5t./ha.)+P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (88kg./ha.), Compost (5t./ha.)+ P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (176Kg./ha.) and the Control (C) respectively. All cultural practices were carried out timely according to the recommendations of the Agricultural                     Research Centre in Sudan. Then the data pertaining the following agronomic traits were recorded, the leaf number; leaf dry weight (g), leaf area index (LAI) (cm), root diameter (RD) (cm) and root fresh weight (RFW) (g). The results of statistical analysis revealed the application of compost in combination with phosphorus displayed significant increase at 5% level for the leaf number (22.75), leaf  area index (5.23), leaf dry weight(36.78), root diameter(69.67) and root fresh weight (422.68), followed by the    application of compost alone compared to the         control and other treatments. The study concludes that the combination of compost and mineral          fertilizer (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) proved to increase all Sugar beet growth and yield parameters.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Agronomic traits</kwd>
        <kwd>Brei conductivity</kwd>
        <kwd>cultural practices</kwd>
        <kwd>Leaf area index</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="0"/>
        <table-count count="6"/>
        <page-count count="9"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1841863564" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris </italic>L.) is one of the                      main raw materials for sugar production in many countries. It is considered to be the second most important crop in the world, after sugarcane for sucrose production. This crop can be grown in a variety of                   climatic conditions, but it is primarily grown in the                temperate latitudes between 30-60<sup>0</sup>C N<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850770572">1</xref>. It can be grown successfully on a range of soil types. On a textural                     classification, in all types of clay, silt, sand and organic soils, but the production may be limited to soils with                 excessive wetness in spring and autumn <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850769564">2</xref>.</p>
      <p>Despite the importance of sugar beet as an           industrial cash crop, its productivity remains low because many farmers luck the technical knowhow of its                       production; and therefore, it became necessary to pay great attention to this point and look for naturally safe stimulating growth substances which can markedly               influence plant growth and yield parameters<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850764452">3</xref>. However, the application of nitrogen fertilizer is considered as an important practice that determines sugar beet growth and production<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850777636">4</xref>. But, compost appears to be less understood as a contributor to soil organic matter and overall soil ecology and management. Nevertheless, it supposed to become another tool which can be used along with the cover crops, animal manure and other management               strategies<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850868420">5</xref>. However, in this regard, the most important point to be considered is the decomposition of                Phosphorous which depends on many variables. The               active composting process leading to a stable product can be completed in a matter of days, weeks or months, and then followed by a maturation phase which may take weeks to months to results in finished mature compost <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850627780">6</xref>.</p>
      <p>Studies showed that compost contains important elements such as nitrogen 0.3% – 1.5% (3g to 15g per kg of compost), phosphorus 0.1% – 1.0% (1g to 10g per kg of compost); and potassium 0.3% – 1.0% (3g to 10g per kg of compost)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850626628">7</xref>. Therefore, it improves the status of the mineral nutrients in plants, particularly the nitrogen, phosphate and potassium<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850624180">8</xref>. Generally, the application of organic               fertilizers is one of the important practical measures to                 improve soil fertility, providing the necessary nutrients for crops, improving soil physico-chemical properties, and organic matter<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850618516">9</xref>. </p>
      <p>It is very important to understand the problem of phosphorus in agriculture, particularly its various forms in the soils, transformation, mobilization, and the                     conditions for the most effective use of phosphorus <sup>10, 11</sup></p>
      <p>There are a lot of information on the various forms of various phosphates and their quantitative                content in different soils. The accumulation of mobile phosphates and phosphates of loose-bound and the                  different-base fractions in the soil are the basis for                  increasing sugar beet yields. The actual concentration of soluble phosphorous in most soils is relatively low—on the order of 1μM—because of several factors, among    these the propensity of phosphorous to form insoluble complexes<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850613404">11</xref>.  Generally, a wide variety of interacting  factors such as soil formation, climatic conditions, and the several processes like weathering, mineralization,                   desorption, immobilization, adsorption, precipitation,  runoff, erosion, organic matter, clay content, soil                         mineralogy and soil pH etc. determine the availability  of phosphorus in the soils<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850764452">3</xref>. </p>
      <p>In plants, phosphorous is found largely as                  phosphate esters-including the sugar-phosphates, which play such an important role in photosynthesis,                      intermediary metabolism and energy metabolism of             cells<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850612684">12</xref>. The optimal level of mobile phosphorus content in the soil is found to be about 30–45 mg·kg<sup>–1</sup> with the sum of loose-bound and different-base 385–445 mg·kg<sup>–1</sup> of soil<sup>13,14</sup>. It is found that nitrogen and phosphorous            application led to an increase in leaf area and biomass. On the other hand, the application of nitrogen increases the total dry weight of the plants and reaching to the                 maximum total dry weight. Moreover, addition of               phosphorus and potassium triggers microorganisms'        activities to improve the compost quality, but the soil        enrichment with phosphorus over the optimal level leads to unproductive costs and low availability of soil               phosphorus<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850602596">15</xref>. Furthermore, the application of FYM + NPK increases the content of organic carbon in the soil, the total content of nitrogen, P and K concentrations<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850600940">16</xref>.   </p>
      <p>It worth mentioning that most of the studies on sugar beet crops concentrated on how to increase the root and sugar productivity. Therefore, many researchers have studied the effects of different fertilization levels and/or different growth regulators. This experiment aimed to study the response of sugar beet growth                  parameters, yield and yield components to the                           application of compost and phosphorus fertilizes under saline soil conditions.  </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841856868" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>The experiment was conducted during the               winter season of 2016–2017 in the demonstration farm of the College of Agriculture, University of Bahri,               Khartoum North, Alkadaro, Sudan (Latitudes 15<sup>0</sup>.44ʹ-15<sup>0</sup>.45ʹ N, Longitudes 32<sup>0</sup> 35ʹ 32<sup>0</sup> 39ʹ E. and Altitudes 398m above the sea level). The area is located in                  semi-arid zone, characterized by long period of dry                  season, hot climate in summer with mean daily maximum temperature between 30 -45°C, and cool in winter, with temperature between 25-10<sup>o</sup>C. Usually it rains in summer and the annual average rainfall ranges between 0 -100mm, and the relative humidity between16% - 50%. The soil is moderate to strong alkaline, with pH 7.5-8; EC 1.1-8.3 dSm<sup>-</sup><sup>1  17</sup>.</p>
      <p>This study adopted the Randomized Complete Block (RCBD) experimental design with three                        replications and six treatments; compost 5t/ha,                        phosphorus 88Kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>/ha, phosphorus 176 Kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>/ha, compost 5t/ha + phosphorus 88Kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>/ha, compost 5t/ha + phosphorus 176Kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>/ha and control which                    referred to (O, P<sub>1</sub>, P<sub>2</sub>, P<sub>1</sub>O, P<sub>2</sub>O and C) respectively. Soil was prepared by disk plough, harrowed, leveled, and ridged. Plot size was 5x4 m; spacing between ridges was 70 cm and 15 cm between plants. Seeds were manually planted on 13/12/2016 by placing two seeds /hole and thinned to one plant/hole. Frequent irrigation was                       carried out every 7-10 days. Harvesting was done on 7/5/2017. Data were collected by taking three plants at  random from the two outer rows of each plot after 7, 10, 13, and 16 weeks after sowing (WAS).  The following       parameters were studied, the Leaves number, Leaf dry weight (g), Leaf Area Index, Root diameter (cm), Root fresh weight (g), Yield and yield components. The data were analyzed, using Statistic 8 software Program.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841846092" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results and Discussion </title>
      <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850301140">table 1</xref> showed significant                     differences in the leaf number of sugar beet as influenced by different treatments of compost and phosphorus. The highest leaf number was obtained in treatment (P2+O)  followed by treatment (P1+O), whereas the lowest one was recorded in treatment (P1)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850585772">17</xref>. The increase of leaf number may be due to nutrients availability which                  released during the decomposition of compost, especially the nitrogen which plays a vital role in plant growth. The available nitrogen that released in the soil from the                    compost mineralization process increases the shoot/root ratio of sugar beet. Also the solubility of phosphorus in soil can be increased due to the presence of compost and phosphate which provide the plant with energy. This          result was in confirmative with the result obtained by Nshimiyimana<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850581380">18</xref> who stated that when sugar beet was evaluated by using cow dung as organic manure and NPK as mineral fertilizer; the differences among                    treatments were significant and high leaf number after four weeks was observed.  Michel, et. Al.; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850581164">19</xref> suggested that the organic manure can benefit crops in various ways through the provision of nitrogen in the early                season and more slowly during the remaining growing period. </p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850301140">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Effect of compost and phosphorus fertilizers and their combinations on leaves No. of sugar beet (ALkadaro-Sudan, 2016/2017).</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Time Treatment.</td>
              <td>7WAS</td>
              <td>10 WAS</td>
              <td>13 WAS</td>
              <td>16 WAS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Control</td>
              <td>8.22 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>17.89 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>25.67 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>31.89 <sup>bc</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>O</td>
              <td>9.33 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>20.22 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>26.89 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>34.89 <sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub></td>
              <td>7.67 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>16.55 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>22.67 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>27.89 <sup>d</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td>8.33 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>21.00 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>25.45 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>28.89 <sup>cd</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub> + O</td>
              <td>9.89 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>19.67 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>26.00 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>33.89 <sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2 </sub>+ O</td>
              <td>9.56 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>20.31 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>24.78 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>36.33 <sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SE+</td>
              <td>0.673</td>
              <td>1.563</td>
              <td>1.583</td>
              <td>1.514</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>C.V</td>
              <td>9.33</td>
              <td>9.93</td>
              <td>7.68</td>
              <td>5.74</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841788436">
            <label/>
            <p>WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly                    different at the 5% level according to (LSD).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>The results of data analysis <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850085212">table 4</xref> showed the study displayed the different treatments of compost, phosphorus and their combinations had significant                effects on Leaf Area Index (L.A.I) of sugar beet <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850249788">table 2</xref>. When the treatment (P2+O) 16 days after sowing (DAS) recorded the highest L.A.I, followed by treatment (O), while the treatment (P1) recorded the lowest one. These results indicated increase of that LAI due to the                    interaction between compost and phosphorus rather than the application of compost or phosphorus alone. The slowly release of nitrogen and phosphorus from compost during the growing season had increased the shoot of sugar beet and as a result LAI increased too. Several                 researchers reported the increase of leaf area of sugar beet with the application of optimum compost                  throughout the development stages. However, the                    mixture of organic and inorganic fertilizers had                          tremendously influenced the growth of sugar beets more than any other treatments <sup>18, 19. </sup></p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850249788">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Effect of compost and phosphorus fertilizers and their combinations on Leaf Area Index of sugar beet (ALkadaro-Sudan, 2016/2017).</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Time Treatment</td>
              <td>7WAS</td>
              <td>10 WAS</td>
              <td>13 WAS</td>
              <td>16 WAS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Control</td>
              <td>0.71 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>2.60 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>2.45 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>09.60 <sup>bc</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>O</td>
              <td>1.03 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>3.23 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>5.38 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>10.45 <sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub></td>
              <td>0.71 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>2.10 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>4.10 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>08.43 <sup>c</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td>0.69 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>3.36 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>5.05 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>09.01 <sup>bc</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub> + O</td>
              <td>0.78 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>3.52 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>5.89 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>10.73 <sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2 </sub>+ O</td>
              <td>1.13 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>2.63 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>4.86 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>11.53 <sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SE+</td>
              <td>0.129</td>
              <td>0.509</td>
              <td>0.918</td>
              <td>0.834</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>C.V</td>
              <td>18.77</td>
              <td>21.46</td>
              <td>24.33</td>
              <td>10.27</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841736908">
            <label/>
            <p>WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly                   different at the 5% level according to (LSD).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p> Leaves dry weight (LDW) (g) of sugar beet; 16 DAS was significantly affected by the different treatments of compost, phosphorus and their combinations <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850177564">table 3</xref>. The highest leaf dry weight was obtained from the                 treatment (P1+O); followed by (P2+O), whereas the                control recorded the lowest one. The increase of leaf dry weight may be depending on the optimum nutrients which released from compost and their uptake by plant, specially the nitrogen during the growing season. This result confirmed with the result found by Michel, et. Al.;.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850581164">19</xref> who found that compost has significantly increased the biomass of sugar beet at different growth stages  as well as the dry weight.</p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850177564">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Effect of compost and phosphorus fertilizers and their combinations on leaves dry weight (g) sugar beet (ALkadaro-Sudan, 2016/2017).</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>TimeTreatment.</td>
              <td>7WAS</td>
              <td>10 WAS</td>
              <td>13 WAS</td>
              <td>16 WAS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Control</td>
              <td>7.27 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>23.32 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>32.61 <sup>cd</sup></td>
              <td>42.70 <sup>d</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>O</td>
              <td>7.90 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>28.79 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>35.22 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>44.94 <sup>c</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub></td>
              <td>7.21 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>27.08 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>32.01 <sup>d</sup></td>
              <td>44.68 <sup>cd</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td>8.02 <sup>abc</sup></td>
              <td>25.98 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>34.56 <sup>cd</sup></td>
              <td>46.18 <sup>c</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub> + O</td>
              <td>9.05 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>35.63 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>46.30 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>56.12 <sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2 </sub>+ O</td>
              <td>8.54 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>34.40 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>41.15 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>52.63 <sup>b</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SE+</td>
              <td>0.510</td>
              <td>1.362</td>
              <td>1.283</td>
              <td>0.969</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>C.V</td>
              <td>7.82</td>
              <td>5.71</td>
              <td>4.25</td>
              <td>2.48</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841698804">
            <label/>
            <p>WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly                   different at the 5% level according to (LSD).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Data analysis in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850085212">table 4</xref> showed the different treatments of compost, phosphorus and their                                   combinations had significant differences on root                     diameter (mm) of sugar beet. The higher records of root diameter were observed in treatment (O) followed by (P1+O) 16 DAS, while the lower one was recorded in the control. This result may be due to the increase of leaf number and L.A.I. which enhanced the photosynthesis process and accumulation of more assimilate. The                          quantity of nitrogen and available phosphorus released from the decomposition of compost had positive effect on root diameter. Similar result was confirmed by Michel, et. Al.; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850581164">19</xref>. They found that the application of compost, animal manure and chemical fertilizer had increased the roots and sugar yield compared with              control. However, application of 40 Mg/ha compost along with 50% chemical fertilizer had produced higher yield than chemical fertilizer alone.</p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850085212">
        <label>Table 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Effect of compost and phosphorus fertilizers and their combinations on root diameter (mm) of sugar beet (ALkadaro-Sudan, 2016/2017).</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>TimeTreatment</td>
              <td>7WAS</td>
              <td>10 WAS</td>
              <td>13 WAS</td>
              <td>16 WAS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Control</td>
              <td>21.41 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>37.04 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>55.37 <sup>d</sup></td>
              <td>82.47 <sup>c</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>O</td>
              <td>28.10 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>58.15 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>84.53 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>107.90 <sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub></td>
              <td>23.24 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>35.98 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>59.77 <sup>cd</sup></td>
              <td>86.37 <sup>c</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td>23.27 <sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>39.61 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>61.68 <sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>96.24 <sup>b</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub> + O</td>
              <td>26.74 <sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>55.44 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>68.16 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>106.45 <sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2 </sub>+ O</td>
              <td>28.14 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>55.64 <sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>67.89 <sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>99.33 <sup>b</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SE+</td>
              <td>1.605</td>
              <td>2.074</td>
              <td>2.404</td>
              <td>3.025</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>C.V</td>
              <td>7.82</td>
              <td>5.41</td>
              <td>4.45</td>
              <td>3.84</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841644444">
            <label/>
            <p>WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850032236">table 5</xref> 16 DAS, revealed that root fresh weight (g) of sugar beet was significantly affected by different treatments of compost, phosphorus and their combination; while the treatment (P1+O)               recorded the highest root fresh weight followed by treatment (O), while the control (C ) recorded the                lowest one.</p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850032236">
        <label>Table 5.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Effect of compost and phosphorus fertilizers and their combinations on root fresh weight (g) of  sugar beet (ALkadaro-Sudan, 2016/2017).</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>TimeTreatment.</td>
              <td>7WAS</td>
              <td>10 WAS</td>
              <td>13 WAS</td>
              <td>16 WAS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Control</td>
              <td>34.777<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>153.77<sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>429.20<sup>ab</sup></td>
              <td>569.01<sup>c</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>O</td>
              <td>45.600<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>206.87<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>457.63<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>777.33<sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub></td>
              <td>37.167<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>125.33<sup>d</sup></td>
              <td>345.11<sup>c</sup></td>
              <td>688.12<sup>bc</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td>34.537<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>147.01<sup>cd</sup></td>
              <td>380.58<sup>bc</sup></td>
              <td>666.27<sup>bc</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub> + O</td>
              <td>45.303<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>258.99<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>452.16<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>934.25<sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2 </sub>+ O</td>
              <td>45.320<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>258.56<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>466.74<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>705.69<sup>bc</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SE+</td>
              <td>   1.6088</td>
              <td>11.125</td>
              <td>   25.778</td>
              <td>76.952</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>C.V</td>
              <td>4.87</td>
              <td>7.11</td>
              <td>7.48</td>
              <td>13.03</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841608756">
            <label/>
            <p>WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Considering the <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850021716">table 6</xref>, the different                   treatments of compost, phosphorus and their                          combinations had non-significant effects on pol% and Brix%, but had significant differences on root yield t/ha and white sugar t/. The highest pol% was observed in treatment (P1+O) followed by (P2) treatment while the lowest percentage was recorded in treatment (P2+O). Treatment (P2) recorded the highest Brix% followed by the treatment (O), whereas the control recorded the lowest percentage. Nevertheless, treatment (P1+O) recorded the highest root yield followed by (P2+O) and (P1),  whereas the control recorded the lowest root yield. Treatment (P1+O) followed by treatment (O) recorded the highest white sugar t/ha, while the control recorded the lowest weight. These results indicated that, the application of compost in combination with adequate rate of phosphorus fertilizer Produced better yield of beet roots and white sugar. This result is in confirmative with the results found by Michel, et. Al.;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1850581164">19</xref>who stated that, the application of compost and chemical fertilizer increase the root and sugar yield compared to control. The application of 40 Mg/ha compost along with 50% chemical fertilizer produced higher yield than the application of chemical fertilizer alone.</p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850021716">
        <label>Table 6.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Effect of compost and phosphorus fertilizers and their combinations on yield and yield                components of sugar beet (ALkadaro-Sudan, 2016/2017). </title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Time Treatment.</td>
              <td>pol%</td>
              <td>Brix %</td>
              <td>Root Yield t/ha</td>
              <td>White Sugar t/ha</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Control</td>
              <td>14.36<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>16.63<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>41.94<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>6.02<sup>b</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>O</td>
              <td>15.41<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>19.10<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>43.71<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>6.58<sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub></td>
              <td>14.23<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>17.18<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>44.28<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>6.35<sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td>15.79<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>20.13<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>40.00<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>6.32<sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>1</sub> + O</td>
              <td>15.97<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>18.97<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>53.83<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>8.68<sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>P<sub>2 </sub>+ O</td>
              <td>14.21<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>17.38<sup>a</sup></td>
              <td>44.28<sup>b</sup></td>
              <td>6.36<sup>ab</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SE+</td>
              <td>1.641</td>
              <td>1.922</td>
              <td>4.124</td>
              <td>1.120</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>C.V</td>
              <td>13.40</td>
              <td>12.91</td>
              <td>11.31</td>
              <td>20.41</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="idm1841532276">
            <label/>
            <p>Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5%                 level according to (LSD).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841532204" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusion and Recommendations </title>
      <p>This study demonstrated that application of     compost had enhanced the mineral nutrition and                  fertility of soil by slow releasing of nutrients during the growing season. The combination of compost and             phosphorus raised the content of nitrogen and soluble phosphate in the soil which led to an increase of                vegetative growth and assimilate production. The                application of compost and phosphorus combinations had positive effects on vegetative growth, yield and yield components of sugar beet than single application. It is recommended that this study to be replicated in Alkadaro and other locations under different climatic conditions and soils.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1850770572">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Grant</surname>
            <given-names>Amy</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>What Are Sugar Beets: Sugar Beet Uses And Cultivation. Gardening, know how</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850769564">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Franzen</surname>
            <given-names>Dave</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Fertilizing Sugar beet. NDSU Extension Service</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2003</year>
          </date>
          <institution>North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science, and U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu</institution>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850764452">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>S Bhullar</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>K Uppal</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>L Kapur</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Influence of planting density and nitrogen dose on root and sugar yield of beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under sub-tropical semi-arid conditions of Punjab</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <source>J. Res. Punjab agric. Univ</source>
          <volume>47</volume>
          <fpage>14</fpage>
          <lpage>7</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850777636">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kh</surname>
            <given-names>Abo-Shady</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hilal</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>SMM</surname>
            <given-names>El-Sheref</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>EElM</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ibrahim</surname>
            <given-names>MFM</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Yield and quality of subarbeet crop as affected by irrigation interval, cultivars and potassium fertilization in north delta</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <source>J. Agric. Res. Kafer. ElSheikh. Univ</source>
          <volume>36</volume>
          <fpage>361</fpage>
          <lpage>76</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850868420">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kihara</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Vlek</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Martius</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Amelung</surname>
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bationo</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Tillage and soil diversity. Influence of conservation tillage on soil microbial diversity, structure and crop yields in sub-humid and semi-arid environments in Kenya. Tropical Soil Biology and fertility (TSBF) institute of CIAT</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <publisher-name>Kenya</publisher-name>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850627780">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Pilar</surname>
            <given-names>Román</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>María</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Martínez;and Alberto</article-title>
          <chapter-title>Pantoja.(2015): FARMER´S COMPOST HANDBOOK. Experiences in Latin America.FAO</chapter-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850626628">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>K Abdel-Fattah</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Merwad</surname>
            <given-names>A M A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effect of different sources of nitrogen fertilizers combined with vermiculite on productivity of wheat and availability of nitrogen in sandy soil in Egypt</article-title>
          <source>Am. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. Technol</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>11</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850624180">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            <given-names>X</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Cai</surname>
            <given-names>H S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            <given-names>R B</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>He</surname>
            <given-names>C M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>Q H</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effects of different organic fertilizers on soil microbial biomass and peanut yield. Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <publisher-loc>Fuzhou 350013, China</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850618516">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Smit</surname>
            <given-names>A L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bindraban</surname>
            <given-names>P S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Schroder</surname>
            <given-names>J J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Conijn</surname>
            <given-names>J G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Van-der</surname>
            <given-names>Meer HG</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Phosphorus in agriculture: global resources, trends and developments: Report to the Steering Committee Technology Assessment of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Netherlands, and</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>in collaboration with the Nutrient Flow Task Group (NFTG), supported by DPRN (Development Policy review Network) [online]. Report No. 282. Wageningen. Plant Research International pp. 36. [Access 12.03.2020]. Available at:https://edepot.wur.nl/12571</chapter-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850615924">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Tirado</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Allsopp</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><article-title>Phosphorus in agriculture: Problems and solutions. Greenpeace Research Laboratories</article-title><date><year>2012</year></date>
Technical Report. Review. 2(35)


</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850613404">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Mahfoud</surname>
            <given-names>Z</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Khaldi</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Korishi</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Wastewater reuse and mapping of irrigable soils</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2020</year>
          </date>
          <source>Case of Sidi Bel Abbes City Algeria. Journal of Water and Land   Development</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850612684">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <institution>Draycott A Philip.(2006). Sugar Beet.BlackwellPublishing.Ltd.UK</institution>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850607420">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Balnur</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rakhimzhan</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Zhenisgul</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Marzhan</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Phosphoric regime of light chestnut soil and sugar beet yield with long-term use of phosphorous fertilizers. Journal of water and land development.49(IV–VI):</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2021</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>151</fpage>
          <lpage>155</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850605260">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Saednia</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Khodadadi</surname>
            <given-names>Sh</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Nikpanah</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <article-title>Dehghanshoar .(2006): The effects of nitrogen and phosphorous application on physiaological parameters of sugar beet seed bearing plants in Ardabil</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Sugar Beet.22:</source>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>1</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850602596">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Óscar</surname>
            <given-names>J Sánchez</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Diego</surname>
            <given-names>A Ospina</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Montoya</surname>
            <given-names>Sandra</given-names>
          </name>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <source>Waste Management</source>
          <volume>69</volume>
          <fpage>136</fpage>
          <lpage>153</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850600940">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Hlisnikovský</surname>
            <given-names>Lukáš</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Ladislav Menšík, Kateřina Křížová, Eva Kunzová.(2021): The Effect of Farmyard Manure and Mineral Fertilizers on Sugar Beet root and Top Yield and Soil Chemical Parameters</article-title>
          <source>Agronomy</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850585772">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Hatim</surname>
            <given-names>A Sulfab</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bakhit</surname>
            <given-names>Baha Eldin M Idris</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hagalla</surname>
            <given-names>Elshiekh</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Karima</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Asha</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wael</surname>
            <given-names>A Marajan</given-names>
          </name>
          <date>
            <year>2017</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Sucrose Concentration of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Under Saline Soil in El Kadaro, Sudan. IJRDO-Journal of Agriculture and Research. Vol.-3 - Issue-12</chapter-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850581380">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Mathieu</surname>
            <given-names>Nshimiyimana</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on growth and yield of beet crop (Beta vulgaris). Beet production</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2012</year>
          </date>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850581164">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Cariolle</surname>
            <given-names>Michel</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Duval</surname>
            <given-names>Rémy</given-names>
          </name>
          <date>
            <year>2006</year>
          </date>
          <source>Sugar Beet. Nutrition – Nitrogen. BlackwellPublishingLtd.UK</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1850594556">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Kabil</surname>
            <given-names>E M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Faize</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Makroum</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Assobhei</surname>
            <given-names>O</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rafrafi</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Loizidou</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Aajjane</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Agronomy</source>
          <chapter-title>Effect of Compost Made with Sludge and Organic Residues on Soil and Sugar Beet Crop in Morocco. Journal of Agronomy</chapter-title>
          <volume>14</volume>
          <fpage>264</fpage>
          <lpage>271</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
